So. Are. Plenty. Of. Others.
Not you! (I hope, unless you broke travel regulations...)
And there are people actually on the climbs right now on social media saying the conditions are fine.
Which they might not be later on. The organisers - the people who decided to shorten the stage, not the riders - quite likely had a very good reason for making this decision.
Vegni just should have done the normal stage, those who don't want to ride can go home, but Vegni has always been a spineless coward. Riders don't have the balls to try something like this at the Tour, when the sponsors are really invested, so don't start talking about safety.
It wasn't the riders who didn't want to ride the full stage... And of course, last time a stage got cut short in the Tour it was
also the organisation.
As mentioned above, there is no reason to believe that the Giau descent is any less dangerous than the cancelled ones
Point 2: it's the riders union guy that communicated the reasons why the stage was shortened, so it is the riders whether you like it or not
From what I understand, the time will be taken at the top of the Giau, effectively neutralising it. And how does the Rider Union communicating the reason mean it was their doing?
---
Seriously... can we just all agree that riders do
not demand that races get cancelled /neutralised everytime the weather gets slightly wonky?