Someno has found the gigantic catapult I'm building on the Zoncolancough
Someno has found the gigantic catapult I'm building on the Zoncolan
Only if there's a short unpaved ramp at the end to get there.ASO would call it the Super Mortirolo.
Epic brainfart on my behalf, but you see a really steep climb with an easier climb after the descent and your brain just goes into Mortirolo mode instead of mentioning the Zoncolan as I should have.cough
I wonder how much money stage finishes cost and if with enough crowd funding you could outbid it. Like with the old $0.60 per text message voting systems in talent shows and ***, if organisers just give 3 different proposals and let fans vote on it how that would go.If I was an eccentric billionaire I'd spend some money every few years to get a stage that is totally over the top (we really need to get Elon Musk hooked to the sport).
A Giro mountain stage finish can cost up to 200k if it's a really expensive one (with roads getting repaved), as far as I know.I wonder how much money stage finishes cost and if with enough crowd funding you could outbid it. Like with the old $0.60 per text message voting systems in talent shows and ***, if organisers just give 3 different proposals and let fans vote on it how that would go.
Agreed! €500k each year to sponsor perhaps 2-3 specific stages. One big medium mountain stage. And 1 or 2 of these great combos of BIG climb followed by easy climb that there are fairly many of in Italy. Not only Finestre-Sestriere and Mortirolo-Aprica, but certainly up to 10 others great combos.If I was an eccentric billionaire I'd spend some money every few years to get a stage that is totally over the top (we really need to get Elon Musk hooked to the sport).
Mortirolo 75 km from the stage finish. And doing the easiest ascent. They should rather done Aprica - Trivigno - Mortirolo (from Mazzo) and back to Aprica.From today's Gazzetta:
![]()
At least it looks like they are using the hard side of he Teglio ascent (and it's a sprint instead of a classified climb, never change RCS):Mortirolo 75 km from the stage finish. And doing the easiest ascent. They should rather done Aprica - Trivigno - Mortirolo (from Mazzo) and back to Aprica.
Yeah, of course it's a good stage. 200 km long. 3 big climbs and a downhill finish after the 5 km with 10 % on Passo Santa Cristina. But we've seen the "classic" Mortirolo - Aprica combo only once after 2010. That is too rarely IMO.At least it looks like they are using the hard side of he Teglio ascent (and it's a sprint instead of a classified climb, never change RCS):
![]()
I mean, a downhill finish after Santa Christina isn't bad either, but it's not as good as a classic Mortirolo stage. I'll have to see how this one works in the context of the overall structure of the race, mainly stage 15 and 16.
I agree, but let's see what they put before the easier Cogne climb on stage 15, maybe that's the stage that features a similar combination. Also, with stage 17 probably being a rather hard MTF this one might work out better, let's see the other stages before we roast them.Yeah, of course it's a good stage. 200 km long. 3 big climbs and a downhill finish after the 5 km with 10 % on Passo Santa Cristina. But we've seen the "classic" Mortirolo - Aprica combo only once after 2010. That is too rarely IMO.
Ok, you're right about that. I forgot that the mountain stages in the last week were so packed. Will be interesting to see what they do on the Cogne stage and on stage 17. Vezzena? And what comes before Vezzena on that stage?I agree, but let's see what they put before the easier Cogne climb on stage 15, maybe that's the stage that features a similar combination. Also, with stage 17 probably being a rather hard MTF this one might work out better, let's see the other stages before we roast them.
In all honesty for the most essential mountain stages I don't see how they could be worse?Honestly, the high mountain stages are mediocre by Giro standards.
The Blockhaus stage is good for the first week and I like the Lavarone stage, but the rest is rather meh...
Aprica finish with the harder side of aprica and no Santa Christina after the easy side of the Mortirolo would be worse.In all honesty for the most essential mountain stages I don't see how they could be worse?