Other than perhaps wandering across the odd border and back during a stage, Grand tours should stay within their borders. Far too much travelling and transfers.
The Tour has it's all stages in France and yet there's very high amount of transfers.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Other than perhaps wandering across the odd border and back during a stage, Grand tours should stay within their borders. Far too much travelling and transfers.
*** makes me worry they couldn't do Finestre.
Other than perhaps wandering across the odd border and back during a stage, Grand tours should stay within their borders. Far too much travelling and transfers.
If they do THAT Aosta stage and Stelvio - Bormio 2000 from Prad I'm fine with no Finestre.*** makes me worry they couldn't do Finestre.
There have and this year is particularly bad for excessive distances between finish and starts.The Tour has it's all stages in France and yet there's very high amount of transfers.
Tempogrinding climbs can be good for racing if everyone is tired and there race has split into lots of small groups, but for that you need a hard stage to tire riders and a hard climb to split the riders up.That would be a really s**tty 'queen stage', after Tzecore it's all tempogrinding.
A queen stage in Aosta could be very good, but I don't see the potential if Finestre is the day after. And the sequence of those climbs seems a bit wrong. Tzecore before Saint-Panthaleon and Joux? The best option in that area would be Saint-Panthaleo first followed by the sequence of Arlaz, Tzecore, Joux and then the finish to Champoluc. The small loop to Antagnod also seems a point pointless.
Yep, apparently no refugees, no police and no social workers. So the Giro seems to be stuck in the middle of the politicians and the judges. I'll guess that the politicians want the plan to go ahead (as do the Albanians) and use the Giro as "sportswashing". If the plan falls apart then the politicians wont want people to be reminded of the debacle (millions of Euros down "the Adriatic" )Nah, it's politics. Italy pays Albania to send immigrants there. Italian courts are questioning the legality of the deal so it might get cancelled. The Giro start somehow was part of the deal.
Yes, it's quite the s-show.
Because RCS are morons who got gaslighted into this stuff, because big money for a Grande Partenza if everything goes right.How did the Giro get embroiled in this? It's the equivalent of the English football association hosting the Charity Shield match in Kigali as part of the Rwanda asylum plan.
There we have it; no Albania next year!
(Just to be clear, the country is probably still going to exist)
La Vuelta never planned to go to Albania though
Tbf the idea of La Vuelta starting in Piemonte is pretty random.Somehow I thought it was the Giro account posting it... I just saw a city in Italy, and knew that there was some questions about where the Giro was starting next year. Well, turn out that sometimes 2+2 does not equal 4.
Somehow I thought it was the Giro account posting it... I just saw a city in Italy, and knew that there was some questions about where the Giro was starting next year. Well, turn out that sometimes 2+2 does not equal 4.
I still rate his chances to go to the Vuelta higher than the Giro.What are the chances Mr Vingegaard goes then?
But, vut...the picture literally has "La Vuelta" right in the middle of it 😀.
Tbf the idea of La Vuelta starting in Piemonte is pretty random.
Yeah Northern Ireland was random AF, but the Vuelta doesn't have as many starts abroad as the Giro or Tour. Also, the Giro has never been to Spain and the idea of it seems weird.I focused on the city, and the big Italian Flag background, not the small logo in the top.
But I guess still less random than the Giro starting in Albania, or Hungary, or Israel, or The Netherlands, or Northern Ireland, or Denmark...
Correct, the Vuelta is not going to Albania next year!There we have it; no Albania next year!
(Just to be clear, the country is probably still going to exist)
Correct, the Vuelta is not going to Albania next year!