Giro d'Italia Giro d'Italia 2025 stage 20: Verrès – Sestrière, 205 km

Page 48 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Oct 2, 2020
2,486
4,513
12,180
Hate to be Gianetti tonight having to take the call from his despotic overlords and explain to them how they didn’t win this race the same as they’ve won every other race going this season. Might be a bit awkward. Still, LOL.
"Send Gianetti in for motivational debrief!"

64095d870592ef552a3e11f17a192c09.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Oldman and Rou
Jul 31, 2024
742
832
4,180
Yates won the giro. He had the legs and rode well. Yates is the main reason he won the giro. I want to say that twice to be sure there can be no doubt.

BUT
this is why despite MVDP being the bigger champion, Visma would probably rather have Van Aert on their roster.
Without Van Aert, Visma would have 0 stage wins. Now they have 2. With himself and Kooij. Without Van Aert their is a good chance Yates podiums this race, and not win it. Just like Van Aert helped Roglic and Vingegaard in the past, he was once again by himself the majority of the team around both their sprinter and their main man for GC. Not just on today stage either. throughout the giro. in crucial moments it was Van Aert that was there.
 
Jun 7, 2011
4,281
2,840
21,180
The start to the Finestre was incredible, EF absolutely shattered a full peloton in about 1km to leaving just Carapaz and Del Toro. This killed UAE off completely and opened the rest of the stage up.

How Yates rode that climb is indicative of how he has rode the whole Giro, not got carried away, not chased every single attack, rode at his own pace, and not gone into the red. As Carapaz said, the smartest rider won.
 
Mar 4, 2011
8,427
11,154
23,180
Yates did clearly an amazing performance, still I wonder why Ef were trying to launch Finestre like it was Redoute or something like that. I think they somewhat cooked Carapaz by doing that.
Regardless, turned out that he wasn’t going to outclimb Del Toro today, so it doesn’t really matter.
 
Sep 14, 2009
6,300
3,561
23,180
Could also be bluster to cover feeling like he failed.
That could be it as well. It is a trend I have also seen when I raced ... some folks would sprint even if we were out of the top 10. Once I even did it. Although to be honest, at least in that circumstance I was in a small group with two others, who were teammates, and who were trying to work me over so one of them could get a coveted 10th or something in a one day RR. So my sprinting at that time was a bit of an F you to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sciatic
Mar 4, 2011
8,427
11,154
23,180
Exactly Finestre is a climb of attrition. You set a steady hard pace, without shooting all your bullets in the beginning. How could EF have thought attacking from the bottom was a good idea?
Because Carapaz isn’t a tempo climber, he would have to do it with repeated attacks a’ la Contador. But I don’t know why they went quite so gonzo, but it made sense to ride very hard from the bottom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oldman
Jun 19, 2009
6,011
886
19,680
Exactly Finestre is a climb of attrition. You set a steady hard pace, without shooting all your bullets in the beginning. How could EF have thought attacking from the bottom was a good idea?
I'd give that thought primarily to the impulsive Mr. Carapaz. He tends to play a bit more than he should and then pay the price. It's why Roglic almost always drops him at stage endings. Del Toro also needed some help but it's possible both were completely undone in week 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Extinction
Jun 19, 2009
6,011
886
19,680
Because Carapaz isn’t a tempo climber, he would have to do it with repeated attacks a’ la Contador. But I don’t know why they went quite so gonzo, but it made sense to ride very hard from the bottom.
Yates is a peaky climber, too. He had to make 4 jumps to get loose and still had the legs to see it through. The DS's in EF and UAE cars must have been losing their collective minds instead of forcing a collaboration.
 
Jun 19, 2009
6,011
886
19,680
Simon Yates was impressive today, but a part of this is thanks to Van Aert.
Partly, yes. Yates would have likely won by a lesser margin but all credit goes to him and the tactics that had a teammate, any teammate up the road.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bkinn
Sep 26, 2020
25,341
27,843
23,180
Because Carapaz isn’t a tempo climber, he would have to do it with repeated attacks a’ la Contador. But I don’t know why they went quite so gonzo, but it made sense to ride very hard from the bottom.

He doesn't have a team that could hold on for long on the climb, and he obviously knew after the last few stages that he had to start early. I doubt they had expected to isolate Del Toro from the get go, but when it happened there was no turning back.
 
Apr 16, 2009
17,600
6,854
28,180
But why not just continue your effort and drop del Toro maybe a minute later? What does Yates have to with this? Carapaz wasn't strong enough, and neither was del Toro.
Because he couldn’t—wasn’t that obvious?
I don’t agree that Del Toro lacked the strength. You can’t say that for sure. He covered every attack. At some point, you have to improvise—and that means starting to defend your leadership in the Giro. There’s a valid case that Carapaz should’ve started working with him. Sure, that carries some risk—but sitting back and doing nothing wasn’t just unwise, it was also heartless"
 
May 6, 2021
12,802
23,725
22,180
Oh dear, it's all kicking off


"Del Toro today proved himself to be the most cold-hearted and cowardly man in the history of cycling. Richard Carapaz demonstrated why he's an Olympic champion and a living cycling legend. Simple."


Good for Simon, he took advantage of the fact that Isaac del Toro was just holding on to Carapaz's balls the entire race and was never able to put his own balls to win by fighting.
 

Latest posts