silvergrenade said:tobydawq said:Benotti69 said:No lynching, call a spade a spade.
Nibali is a work in progress, Aru, Evans, Vino, Armstrong, Landis, Shcleck, Contador, Valverde........................they are or were.......
I believe Aicar helps the loss of inner fat![]()
Now you're just ignoring what I say...
I know these types of products exist but am arguing that the changes in body composition might be possible without them.
As for the rest of your post, I don't get your point. We're talking about transformations between different types of riders and you bring up people like Aru, Schleck, Contador and Valverde. Why? I never said that Thomas doesn't get medically aided in order to achieve his results. I merely stated that he might have changed his rider type without such aids (and I don't even categorically state that he definitely hasn't used them since I have no way of knowing). I just think it's odd for people to be more inclined to wanting to see Thomas shown a suspension than all other GC riders just because he has changed into becoming one from being a track rider.
Let me just say it out loud here. This forum exists to belittle Sky. Even when they do believe everyone is doping, they choose to point out at Froome, Thomas, Wiggins just because there is hate towards these particular riders, knowing theres a previously banned Contador and another nearly 40 year old previously banned Spanish rider on his best start to the season EVER.
Here hard work has no meaning. The ideal example being Betancur who with all his talent is still ****.
Dope and hard work is part of the game. Froome beats everyone at this game because of his will, hard work, preparation and his physiological gifts. Same was with Armstrong. Same was with Contador when he won.
Benotti69 said:silvergrenade said:tobydawq said:Benotti69 said:No lynching, call a spade a spade.
Nibali is a work in progress, Aru, Evans, Vino, Armstrong, Landis, Shcleck, Contador, Valverde........................they are or were.......
I believe Aicar helps the loss of inner fat![]()
Now you're just ignoring what I say...
I know these types of products exist but am arguing that the changes in body composition might be possible without them.
As for the rest of your post, I don't get your point. We're talking about transformations between different types of riders and you bring up people like Aru, Schleck, Contador and Valverde. Why? I never said that Thomas doesn't get medically aided in order to achieve his results. I merely stated that he might have changed his rider type without such aids (and I don't even categorically state that he definitely hasn't used them since I have no way of knowing). I just think it's odd for people to be more inclined to wanting to see Thomas shown a suspension than all other GC riders just because he has changed into becoming one from being a track rider.
Let me just say it out loud here. This forum exists to belittle Sky. Even when they do believe everyone is doping, they choose to point out at Froome, Thomas, Wiggins just because there is hate towards these particular riders, knowing theres a previously banned Contador and another nearly 40 year old previously banned Spanish rider on his best start to the season EVER.
Here hard work has no meaning. The ideal example being Betancur who with all his talent is still ****.
Dope and hard work is part of the game. Froome beats everyone at this game because of his will, hard work, preparation and his physiological gifts. Same was with Armstrong. Same was with Contador when he won.
Sky fans like you crying about posts about sky's obvious doping is pathetic.
There are thousands of threads in here and and sky are a small %
Sky work harder than everyone else? Since when? Since they hired Geert Leinders and Brian Cookson who helped set up Sky they have learned to work hard :lol:
Contador threads and Valverde threads here. Please post in them![]()
silvergrenade said:I'm not here to argue with you. If you think what I wrote is crying, well, good for you.
Thats the thing. Its people like you who've created an image on Sky fans being stupid, dumb and hence, theres a taboo of not wanting to be Sky supporters.
Yes, and there are other riders whose doping is also obvious. Yet you chose to point out 3 guys from Sky.
About your last point; Thomas, Froomes and Wiggins individual threads are there. Please post in them. Youre the who brought them up, not me
silvergrenade said:tobydawq said:Benotti69 said:No lynching, call a spade a spade.
Nibali is a work in progress, Aru, Evans, Vino, Armstrong, Landis, Shcleck, Contador, Valverde........................they are or were.......
I believe Aicar helps the loss of inner fat![]()
Now you're just ignoring what I say...
I know these types of products exist but am arguing that the changes in body composition might be possible without them.
As for the rest of your post, I don't get your point. We're talking about transformations between different types of riders and you bring up people like Aru, Schleck, Contador and Valverde. Why? I never said that Thomas doesn't get medically aided in order to achieve his results. I merely stated that he might have changed his rider type without such aids (and I don't even categorically state that he definitely hasn't used them since I have no way of knowing). I just think it's odd for people to be more inclined to wanting to see Thomas shown a suspension than all other GC riders just because he has changed into becoming one from being a track rider.
Let me just say it out loud here. This forum exists to belittle Sky. Even when they do believe everyone is doping, they choose to point out at Froome, Thomas, Wiggins just because there is hate towards these particular riders, knowing theres a previously banned Contador and another nearly 40 year old previously banned Spanish rider on his best start to the season EVER.
Here hard work has no meaning. The ideal example being Betancur who with all his talent is still ****.
Dope and hard work is part of the game. Froome beats everyone at this game because of his will, hard work, preparation and his physiological gifts. Same was with Armstrong. Same was with Contador when he won.
Benotti69 said:silvergrenade said:I'm not here to argue with you. If you think what I wrote is crying, well, good for you.
Thats the thing. Its people like you who've created an image on Sky fans being stupid, dumb and hence, theres a taboo of not wanting to be Sky supporters.
Yes, and there are other riders whose doping is also obvious. Yet you chose to point out 3 guys from Sky.
About your last point; Thomas, Froomes and Wiggins individual threads are there. Please post in them. Youre the who brought them up, not me
Sky fans have swallowed the who Sky Marginal gains shtick that Brailsford spouted since day one how they were going to work on the details to better at everything and get a tiny gain out of everything.
Then in the commons they admitted they didn't even know what was in a jiffy bag because they did not keep records.
Then the sky lies that been exposed time and time again. To believe in Sky is stupid and dumb.
To lose inner fat? Really how does one achieve that? How does one go about measuring the inner fat? Where does the inner fat reside in the human body ( in sky fans it is in the head obviously)?![]()
deviant said:To lose inner fat? Really how does one achieve that? How does one go about measuring the inner fat? Where does the inner fat reside in the human body ( in sky fans it is in the head obviously)?![]()
Men are known to store visceral fat around organs which is just one of the many reasons why men suffer more with cardiovascular disease and woman tend to store fat on the hips, buttocks etc instead of around the torso, in other words away from essential organs....if (and it's a big if) someone has found a way to mobilize that internal fat then it's possible to further reduce fat on athletes that already look like holocaust victims.
To give skeptics an example that I'm not talking nonsense the fat around your kidneys is known as suet and perfectly edible.
How does one remove that inner fat to get from the grupetto to the 3 TdF wins?
BullsFan22 said:Who was the last Austrian to win a stage at a GT? Kohl in 2008 TDF? He had his win taken because he was caught, right? Then it'd have to be Georg Totschnig at the 2003 TDF.
roundabout said:BullsFan22 said:Who was the last Austrian to win a stage at a GT? Kohl in 2008 TDF? He had his win taken because he was caught, right? Then it'd have to be Georg Totschnig at the 2003 TDF.
Neither of them won a stage in the races you mentioned.
Kohl never won a stage.BullsFan22 said:Who was the last Austrian to win a stage at a GT? Kohl in 2008 TDF? He had his win taken because he was caught, right? Then it'd have to be Georg Totschnig at the 2003 TDF.
roundabout said:And yet Rasmussen was still about 4th best in the Pyrenees. I should probably look up his blood test results again.
Good post.tobydawq said:roundabout said:And yet Rasmussen was still about 4th best in the Pyrenees. I should probably look up his blood test results again.
I attended a lecture held by him just this week where he told about his career. In 2005 he hadn't prepared himself for winning the Tour. His modest goal was to win a stage and the KOM jersey so when he suddenly found himself fighting for GC, he was caught out due to a) not having spent any time training his TT and b) not having made a medical plan that would sustain a proper bid for GC.
He did that the next year but it came to nought when a lot of his blood bags stored in Vienna were flushed into the Danube river when the Austrian skiing team who used the same facility was busted during the Winter Olympics in Turin causing panic in the owners of the blood bank.
Then he bought his own centrifuge together with two other riders (he didn't name them but I think he has done that before and I think they were Bernhard Kohl and perhaps Thomas Dekker, but I'm not sure) and was firing on all cylinders in 2007.
It was very interesting, really. He was quite funny and seems like a cool and no-nonsense kind of guy who clearly sees himself as the best and has no moral scruples with what he has done - as he said, all near-rivals have subsequently been exposed as having taken medical aids as well.
In fact, he argued that doping was less dangerous than anti-doping. He was very close to commiting suicide when he was pulled from the Tour and others have taken that step - not many riders have had negative health effects caused by drugs in the modern era and as he said, we would probably all be better off with a little erythropoietin to increase the oxygen flow to the brain![]()
Now, he advises people to not take drugs but his reasoning is not that it's unfair or against the rules, but that everybody eventually gets caught and the success is not worth the downfall and public shaming. But he was under no illusions that things had bettered significantly in the peloton since his days because everything he did was still possible to do today.
Valv.Piti said:Good post.
Robbed of TdF 2007. When people say Contador has won two Tours it should be '09 and '10 instead of '07 and '09.
I still have nightmares about that vacation, watching all the Pyreneen stages in a bar with a dutch guy, cheering on our 50-kg man MR, the one and only, watching him winning atop Aubisque after out dueling an incredible Contador in the Maillot Jaune, then the next day taken out. It was all he had dreamt about since he was a kid, all that mattered... Good lord.
tobydawq said:roundabout said:And yet Rasmussen was still about 4th best in the Pyrenees. I should probably look up his blood test results again.
I attended a lecture held by him just this week where he told about his career. In 2005 he hadn't prepared himself for winning the Tour. His modest goal was to win a stage and the KOM jersey so when he suddenly found himself fighting for GC, he was caught out due to a) not having spent any time training his TT and b) not having made a medical plan that would sustain a proper bid for GC.
He did that the next year but it came to nought when a lot of his blood bags stored in Vienna were flushed into the Danube river when the Austrian skiing team who used the same facility was busted during the Winter Olympics in Turin causing panic in the owners of the blood bank.
Then he bought his own centrifuge together with two other riders (he didn't name them but I think he has done that before and I think they were Bernhard Kohl and perhaps Thomas Dekker, but I'm not sure) and was firing on all cylinders in 2007.
It was very interesting, really. He was quite funny and seems like a cool and no-nonsense kind of guy who clearly sees himself as the best and has no moral scruples with what he has done - as he said, all near-rivals have subsequently been exposed as having taken medical aids as well.
In fact, he argued that doping was less dangerous than anti-doping. He was very close to commiting suicide when he was pulled from the Tour and others have taken that step - not many riders have had negative health effects caused by drugs in the modern era and as he said, we would probably all be better off with a little erythropoietin to increase the oxygen flow to the brain![]()
Now, he advises people to not take drugs but his reasoning is not that it's unfair or against the rules, but that everybody eventually gets caught and the success is not worth the downfall and public shaming. But he was under no illusions that things had bettered significantly in the peloton since his days because everything he did was still possible to do today.