Yep, he rode another Giro MTF with the best climbers in the race.Pantani Attacks said:Diego Ullissi again. Just LOL
Irondan said:Yep, he rode another Giro MTF with the best climbers in the race.Pantani Attacks said:Diego Ullissi again. Just LOL![]()
I couldn't believe my eye's when I saw him at one point during the finale, he should not have been there...
carton said:The gap has to be big pretty big for that to be true though. I've mentioned this before, but in 2005, Ardila got annoyed with how slow Salvodelli (arguably the best in history) was descending off Finestre, almost crashed them both on a turn, and ended up saving Salvodelli's Giro by pacing him nearly all the way down (and nearly all the way back up). Now Ardila was underrated as a descender, but it's hard to say he's was as good as Il Falco.DFA123 said:It's a pretty marginal advantage though. And a tired, excellent descender will certainly be able to put a fresher, poor descender to the sword.
DirtyWorks said:Proof please.Kicker661 said:.... when they boosted haematocrit to 60+ but.now they are low-mid 40S so cardiac issues are no longer there.
Shall we review the impressive performance gains over weeks of recovery doping?
Timed descents would be great - presumably the UCI would site safety reasons, but that's a bit of a cop-out considering the clock is still running anyway during races. And they should definitely introduce a new jersey - King of the Descents - replacing the polka dots with massive cojones.doperhopper said:carton said:The gap has to be big pretty big for that to be true though. I've mentioned this before, but in 2005, Ardila got annoyed with how slow Salvodelli (arguably the best in history) was descending off Finestre, almost crashed them both on a turn, and ended up saving Salvodelli's Giro by pacing him nearly all the way down (and nearly all the way back up). Now Ardila was underrated as a descender, but it's hard to say he's was as good as Il Falco.DFA123 said:It's a pretty marginal advantage though. And a tired, excellent descender will certainly be able to put a fresher, poor descender to the sword.
This leads to the inevitable question: Why we don't have the descents timed?
Imagine... descending heroes officially praised, record tables, , Dr. Ferrari introducing VDM instead of VAM... maybe something in place of Cima Coppi (Valle Bartali?), or some descender-oriented GT classification.
And, last but not least: Strava Kamikaze Of The Mountain ranking.
That's a list with some real classBenotti69 said:the real winners
Giro d'Italia doctors’ podium:
1) E. Magni (Mercatone Uno, Fassa Bortolo)
2) M. Rodriguez (Banesto)
3) J. Hoyo (ONCE, Mapei, QuickStep)
New generation
Benotti69 said:the real winners
Giro d'Italia doctors’ podium:
1) E. Magni (Mercatone Uno, Fassa Bortolo)
2) M. Rodriguez (Banesto)
3) J. Hoyo (ONCE, Mapei, QuickStep)
New generation
doperhopper said:Benotti69 said:the real winners
Giro d'Italia doctors’ podium:
1) E. Magni (Mercatone Uno, Fassa Bortolo)
2) M. Rodriguez (Banesto)
3) J. Hoyo (ONCE, Mapei, QuickStep)
New generation
we should really have a Clinic edition of "How the race was won"
DFA123 said:I would love to see them scrap at least one the rest days in GTs and replace it with a downhill TT. If there were rider protests about safety (which I'm sure there would be from the rubbish descenders) - you could just use a really technical route, so the top speed would only be about 50km/h.
Very nice; shame about the flat second half thoughvedrafjord said:DFA123 said:I would love to see them scrap at least one the rest days in GTs and replace it with a downhill TT. If there were rider protests about safety (which I'm sure there would be from the rubbish descenders) - you could just use a really technical route, so the top speed would only be about 50km/h.
1987 Giro stage 1b was basically a downhill time trial - the first half was the descent of the Poggio and the second half was flat.
Here's a remarkable highlights video with commentary from Jimmy Magee and some guy called Pat McQuaid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nScZ7EjVGHI
When McQuaid is back as UCI president and this idea gets traction, let the record show that it was dopperhopper and DFA and not me who got it rollingDFA123 said:Timed descents would be great - presumably the UCI would site safety reasons, but that's a bit of a cop-out considering the clock is still running anyway during races. And they should definitely introduce a new jersey - King of the Descents - replacing the polka dots with massive cojones.doperhopper said:carton said:The gap has to be big pretty big for that to be true though. I've mentioned this before, but in 2005, Ardila got annoyed with how slow Salvodelli (arguably the best in history) was descending off Finestre, almost crashed them both on a turn, and ended up saving Salvodelli's Giro by pacing him nearly all the way down (and nearly all the way back up). Now Ardila was underrated as a descender, but it's hard to say he's was as good as Il Falco.DFA123 said:It's a pretty marginal advantage though. And a tired, excellent descender will certainly be able to put a fresher, poor descender to the sword.
This leads to the inevitable question: Why we don't have the descents timed?
Imagine... descending heroes officially praised, record tables, , Dr. Ferrari introducing VDM instead of VAM... maybe something in place of Cima Coppi (Valle Bartali?), or some descender-oriented GT classification.
And, last but not least: Strava Kamikaze Of The Mountain ranking.
I would love to see them scrap at least one the rest days in GTs and replace it with a downhill TT. If there were rider protests about safety (which I'm sure there would be from the rubbish descenders) - you could just use a really technical route, so the top speed would only be about 50km/h.