The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
DFA123 said:Reminds me more of Wiggins. Armstrong, for all his faults, was pretty entertaining at times and rode with a fair bit of panache. Kruijswijk, like Wiggins, is just grinding the life out of the GC battle.gmedina said:the more i look at Kruijswijk, the more he is reminding me of LA....
luckyboy said:Ulissi reminds me of Santambrogio's change. Maybe not as crazy but still a hilly rider who is climbing a lot better than ever before
DFA123 said:Perhaps a bit harsh on Kruijswijk today, but there is something satisfying about pivotal moments in races resting on bike handling (or lack of it). It's still the one part of cycling that doping and motors can have little influence over.
I'm sure that Shimano and Sram will try to introduce something ridiculous like that in the not too distant future.doperhopper said:DFA123 said:Perhaps a bit harsh on Kruijswijk today, but there is something satisfying about pivotal moments in races resting on bike handling (or lack of it). It's still the one part of cycling that doping and motors can have little influence over.
how about some kind of autopilot?
autonomous cars are almost in the production stage... why not something similar for bike, perhaps with fresh road condition data update (on a turn-by-turn basis) from a morning motoman ride
"Brings out the tiger in you, in you!"jmdirt said:Like corn flakes?TomLPC said:That was absolutely ceraeal
RIGHT GUYS?
jmdirt said:Like corn flakes?TomLPC said:That was absolutely ceraeal
RIGHT GUYS?
DFA123 said:Perhaps a bit harsh on Kruijswijk today, but there is something satisfying about pivotal moments in races resting on bike handling (or lack of it). It's still the one part of cycling that doping and motors can have little influence over.
Agreed - hence saying little, rather than no influenceel chava said:DFA123 said:Perhaps a bit harsh on Kruijswijk today, but there is something satisfying about pivotal moments in races resting on bike handling (or lack of it). It's still the one part of cycling that doping and motors can have little influence over.
Of course dope works for descending as well. Juiced up on EPO/blood makes you fresher and therefore more relaxed and aware once over the top. Stimulants also helps (just not use too much!).
Bettini needed a court injunction just to ride the 2007 worlds, because he kicked up such a stink about the UCI's anti doping charter that he refused to sign. He's also been accused of supplying teammates and tipping off riders before tests. He was also mentored by Michele Bartoli.Franklin said:Well, he's got the core of why doping can not be eradicated squarely in his sights.hrotha said:Don't embarrass yourself with this kind of argument.CheckMyPecs said:When did Bettini ever test positive?jmdirt said:Another funny thing is that Bettini, the poster boys for how well doping can work, is one of the vocal critics.
Seriously, Bettini never tested positive, so he's for all purposes a clean rider. And yes, we know this is likely a scam (about as likely as I'm Eddy Merckx hiding behind this nikc), but that's not that important.
The gap has to be big pretty big for that to be true though. I've mentioned this before, but in 2005, Ardila got annoyed with how slow Salvodelli (arguably the best in history) was descending off Finestre, almost crashed them both on a turn, and ended up saving Salvodelli's Giro by pacing him nearly all the way down (and nearly all the way back up). Now Ardila was underrated as a descender, but it's hard to say he's was as good as Il Falco.DFA123 said:It's a pretty marginal advantage though. And a tired, excellent descender will certainly be able to put a fresher, poor descender to the sword.
Pantani Attacks said:Franklin said:Or next year 27 april 2017 the city of Stuttgart will be hit by a rainstorm.Pantani Attacks said:Juicing to the levels they are at their age to get to the same level as their younger peers is not good for one's body, specifically the heart. Both will probably drop dead before they turn 60.
Seriously, there's no way you can estimate when a future athlete dies. Freg, I lost two colleagues under 60 this year and they sure as hell did not dope. I'm not convinced if what a guy like Valverde does is more unhealthy than smoking. The fact he's so consistent could also mean it's very well monitored.
We are no physicans (and even they do not know!). Claims like these are utterly random.
You're seriously implying taking substances that are completely unnatural to the body do not deter health and life expectancy? This isn't a chocolate bar or a bag of chips we're talking about, it's stuff that puts intense strain on the bodies organs. Of course it's shortening their life.
FoxxyBrown1111 said:Cool isn´t it? But Horner is still active.
Proof please.Kicker661 said:.... when they boosted haematocrit to 60+ but.now they are low-mid 40S so cardiac issues are no longer there.
DirtyWorks said:Proof please.Kicker661 said:.... when they boosted haematocrit to 60+ but.now they are low-mid 40S so cardiac issues are no longer there.
Shall we review the impressive performance gains over weeks of recovery doping?