Graham Watson: Keeper of Omerta

Page 5 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 6, 2009
4,601
503
17,080
Watson like a lot of other people in cycling simply follow the golden goose and Armstrong was/is the biggest golden goose. Evidence, he had a photographic section in Cycle Sport this year and when they announced Criterium International was being held in Corsica he expressed his dissappointment that he wouldnt be going as it was too out of the way. He said it would be the first time he wouldnt be attnending in 20 years. Armstrong then announces his appearence at the race and suddenly Watson is going to Criterium International. When in doubt simply follow the money trail.
 

Polish

BANNED
Mar 11, 2009
3,853
1
0
Benotti69 said:
I forgive you in a non catholic christian manner.....

aye Mother theresa, another con artist and giant fraud.
UpTheRoad said:
The Case Against Mother Teresa

Thanks for the heads up.

The Carlos Laflauta review spoke volumes.
buckwheat said:
I remembered vague criticisms of Mother Teresa but didn't know specifics. I won't use her example again in any analogies of goodness.
Thanks again

benotto69 said:
you are welcome. destroying myth's is all part of the clinic.....

OMG, the haters are now saying Lance is as EVIL as Mother Theresa:(

MotherTeresa.COM versus MotherTeresa.ORG....

Bribed Pope John Paul $500,000....

"Young man, do NOT spit in the soup"
"Seriously, don't spit in the soup"


photo-50.jpg
 

flicker

BANNED
Aug 17, 2009
4,153
0
0
So first you go after Lance, athlete, founder of an organization promoting cancer research, cancer survivor, TdF winner.

Next the haters attack Mother Teresa who takes care of Indian orphans.

What next? A hate column on the clinic about the Dalai Lama? Supporter of human rights for his countrymen.
 
Mar 11, 2009
10,526
3,554
28,180
Cut the Mother Theresa talk, and all related discussions, now. Same with the back and forth snide insults. Apparently many of you skipped over my previous message:
Alpe d'Huez said:
Let's stay on topic here, okay folks? Consider this a warning.

Next person who makes an off-topic post takes a week vacation.

:mad:
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
there are many better sports photographers out there than Watson. he specialises and has made buddies with LA and that no doubt helped pay the mortgage. no doubt he will slide as those who he aligned himself with disappear from cycling.

To label a 3 time TdF champion, twice world champ and never had any aspersions to doping, (except by the pharmastrong corporation) a fool, shows who truly is the fool.
 
Jul 29, 2010
1,440
0
10,480
Benotti69 said:
there are many better sports photographers out there than Watson. he specialises and has made buddies with LA and that no doubt helped pay the mortgage. no doubt he will slide as those who he aligned himself with disappear from cycling.

To label a 3 time TdF champion, twice world champ and never had any aspersions to doping, (except by the pharmastrong corporation) a fool, shows who truly is the fool.

There is no indication he labeled GL a fool, read his words below, he did state he would speak with the webmaster and its been fixed. I do agree LA should shut the hell up and go away and so apparently does GW.

Hi Eric, I've not noticed that mistake, I'll have my webmaster look at it. Sorry we cannot appease you, I'm a fan of both guys, they both did a lot for my career, just a shame one cannot keep his mouth shut.. GW
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
JMBeaushrimp said:
It's a sad lesson, but one Graham has seemed to have learned well - "Don't sh*t where you eat, my friends. Don't sh*t where you eat." Thanks to Ween...

Or "get offa my Dic# you wee bitty #uck"



Watson can Pyss up a rope! ;)
 
Sep 13, 2010
307
5
9,295
“@darachmcquaid: Lots of bloggers/w*****s commenting on @grahamwatson10 view on Lemond. After 32yrs on a moto, methinks his opinion is worthy.”

Hmmm
 
Jul 23, 2009
2,891
1
0
@dumbarsemcquack: Glad yer reading this. Always good to hear the opinion of such an honourable fellow. However nobody was questioning Chub's knowledge of cycling were they? The discussion was about his website containing an insulting reference to LeMond. After 32 years making money from cycling methinks he shouldn't bite the hundreds of hands that appear to be feeding him.
 
Mar 11, 2009
748
1
0
Berzin said:
It is the height of disrespect to publicly label one of his most iconic subjects a fool just because Lemond sees something that obviously, through his many telephoto lenses, Watson refuses to see.

The only thing Watson knows is photography. He is the one who should be quiet, because he has lost his objectivity a long time ago.

Watson, Liggett, Sherwen and that disgusting hamster-faced moron Bob Roll are nothing but prostitutes who will blindly follow their pimp Armstrong off a cliff if it means more money in their pockets.

That's what I'm saying too.. They played their hand now we can see them for who they are. Omerta
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
Sorry for the cuss words from lyrics to Ween songs people. I tried to hide them but wasnt successful. I hope you all are not offended. get a ding 1 for it tooo

BTW can someone please tell me how best to dodge the language gauge with the word douchebag? should I hyphenate it? Douche-Bag or is D0uchb@g cool. Perhaps just d bag.

I don't know
 
Jul 29, 2010
431
0
0
SpartacusRox said:
I am amazed at the hypocrisy... How posters such as this one can talk about "the height of disrespect' because one person calls another one a 'fool' and in the next breath themselves label other people 'prostitutes', 'hamster faced' and 'pimps' is beyond belief...

No hypocrisy. Many of us on here believe that a Lemond is deserving of a much HIGHER LEVEL OF RESPECT than say, a Mr. Roll.

One is a 3x Tour winner and long-time voice in the wilderness speaking out against doping. The other is carnival barker who has long had his lips wrapped tight round the exhaust pipe of the Armstrong tour bus.

Respect is earned, primarily through actions.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
You know that you stepped in it when you have to rely on a second string McQuaid to come to your defense.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
JRTinMA said:
There is no indication he labeled GL a fool, read his words below, he did state he would speak with the webmaster and its been fixed. I do agree LA should shut the hell up and go away and so apparently does GW.

his website so he takes responsibility for his work. to blame his webmaster is weak....

so the McQuaids are looking into the clinic, no surprise there, well those 'straydogs' must be pí$$ed off reading about all their fuax pas that get dissected on here.....:D
 
Jul 6, 2010
99
0
0
LeMond's children have been quite vocal recently... which can make you wonder about what has been done exactly onto this family.
 
Mar 13, 2009
2,932
55
11,580
flicker said:
So first you go after Lance, athlete, founder of an organization promoting cancer research, cancer survivor, TdF winner.

Next the haters attack Mother Teresa who takes care of Indian orphans.

What next? A hate column on the clinic about the Dalai Lama? Supporter of human rights for his countrymen.

Flicker, as someone who is totally in touch with Armstrong, how can you suggest that he founded "an organization promoting cancer research".

"Awareness" is not research.

Deliberate attempt to misinform?
 
Jul 29, 2010
431
0
0
frenchfry said:
Flicker, as someone who is totally in touch with Armstrong, how can you suggest that he founded "an organization promoting cancer research".

"Awareness" is not research.

Deliberate attempt to misinform?


No, it's just after you've drank enough Kool-Aid, it starts to taste like fine Bordeaux and your tastebuds can't tell the difference.

In the same manner, Tom Hanks used to believe a volleyball was his good frend, Wilson. :p
 
Mar 19, 2009
2,819
1
11,485
Quick idea.
Would UCI grant "favorable" broadcasters a better rate for TV rights, in an under the table sort of deal?
Dutch NOS broadcasters for instance are extremely pro-omerta, pro-Lance.
 
Jun 16, 2009
3,035
0
0
CAn anyone explain what the last roughly 20 posts have to do with Graham Watson and this thread?


No?


Okay, then I am going to move this to a new thread.
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,894
2,253
25,680
Martin318is said:
CAn anyone explain what the last roughly 20 posts have to do with Graham Watson and this thread?


No?


Okay, then I am going to move this to a new thread.
Well, Armstrong was only following Simone because of what she said to Graham Watson, so there.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Martin318is said:
CAn anyone explain what the last roughly 20 posts have to do with Graham Watson and this thread?


No?


Okay, then I am going to move this to a new thread.

There all in relation to Mr. Watson and the the subject of this thread. Basically LeMond's children started having a go at Watson on Twitter about calling their Dad a fool in one of his photographs. Lance said relax but the kids thought that was creepy. Go check them out yourself.
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
5
0
thehog said:
There all in relation to Mr. Watson and the the subject of this thread. Basically LeMond's children started having a go at Watson on Twitter about calling their Dad a fool in one of his photographs. Lance said relax but the kids thought that was creepy. Go check them out yourself.

Uh. Stop for a minute and think about what you are doing.