- Aug 13, 2009
- 12,854
- 1
- 0
Michele said:Granfondo, at least in Italy, were at first what cyclosportive are now around the world; a mass start with thousands of cycling lovers in a nice scenary with not any final ranking.
Donno when exactly it happened, but they started to put ranking at these events and they turned out in a mess (imho); a bad mix between a race and a cyclosportive.
NB 1: there are still many cyclosportive events in Italy.
NB 2: Im not against granfondos, I actually like them but lately they are getting over the top in some aspects.
This is spot on. I don't know when but they have changed a lot in the last 5 years.
I have done 2-5 a year for the last 5 years and they have been a lot of fun. Usually the courses are excellent and they offer a excellent opportunity to push yourself in a fun environment. Recently the depth of competition, and the seriousness, has become a bit absurd.
This summer I did the GF Cuenego and the first 90 minutes was ridiculously dangerous. People were taking stupid risks in an effort to move up. I was riding with a buddy who was a former Pro (10 years, Tour stage Winner) and he kept turning to me and saying "Let get out of here"
On the descent of the first climb I saw one of the worst crashes I have seen in 30 years of riding, major blood, rider not moving. Disturbing.
Regardless of the changes, doing a few big GF should be on anyone's "list".
How do they compare to GF in the US? There really is little comparison. The depth of competition in Italy is on a completely different level. If you are a good climbing Cat 3 top 10% is a good goal....but that could mean 500th place!