That's why I'm, a bit to my shock and his, in agreement with Pistolet on the Valverde case, and think he shouldn't be back until May. And as a result, I kind of have to follow that with Contador. Ban him for two years, but don't give us this backdating nonsense. Two years on the shelf, he keeps every result in the interim but it gets an asterisk next to it. He'll have been tested every day in the leader's jersey of those WT races and came back clean, so why remove it? I mean, Davide Rebellin still won 2009 Flèche Wallonne, why was his ban not backdated and his interim results removed the same?
This re-allocation of results is such a messy game because it totally redesigns the rankings and affects which teams could or would have got licences, and that can affect budgets and whether teams collapse or stay on or whether sponsors stay. All on some fictitious race result where we have to imagine somebody disappeared. It was confusing enough with Valverde, but at least all that was done in 2010, and the ranking points were re-allocated in time to do the licences for 2011.