Nope. I asked him a question about his riders and WADA but he didn't answer.Benotti69 said:I have not read JV or Weltz confirm that Weltz talked to USADA/WADA.
Have you?
Nope. I asked him a question about his riders and WADA but he didn't answer.Benotti69 said:I have not read JV or Weltz confirm that Weltz talked to USADA/WADA.
Have you?
glassmoon said:there is ONE thing that is SAD about all those "past" dopers and their "book-confessions": the cheaters earn TWICE!!!
1. they earned big money when racing with help of doping
2. they earn money by selling the books/interviews when confessing that they were f*cking cheaters!
![]()
![]()
they should be sanctioned for all money they've earned by cheating. also, isn't it against the law when you claim profit by cheating/lying?
- i mean, it's good to know truth... but come on, there should be consequences. now you can see the cheaters/liars as a successful team managers, etc. that's just wrong.
neineinei said:sporten.dk has been talking to Weltz again to ask him about his response after Vaughters sent him an e-mail asking Weltz to explain. Weltz says nothing is changed.
"- Jeg svarede ham, at jeg ikke kan genkende den situation, som bliver beskrevet i bogen. Det ville være uærligt af mig at sige, at det kan jeg godt huske. Det er virkelig ikke sandheden, siger Johnny Weltz."
Google translate
"- I told him that I do not recognize the situation which is described in the book. It would be dishonest of me to say that I remember. It really is not the truth, says Johnny Weltz."
There is also a video clip of an interview in Danish.
http://www.sporten.dk/cykling/tv-weltz-svarer-sin-chef-0
hrotha said:Nope. I asked him a question about his riders and WADA but he didn't answer.
Yes, but I followed that up with a question about why no Slipstream rider had ever served a reduced suspension. The federal investigation is not a good explanation, since these riders are supposed to have confessed in 2007-2008, and some even later (are we to think the ex-Gerolsteiner guys were always clean?).the asian said:Didn't he say that riders he suspected of doping had to fully confess to WADA/USADA.
He didn't reply whether the support staff had to, though.
hrotha said:Yes, but I followed that up with a question about why no Slipstream rider had ever served a reduced suspension. The federal investigation is not a good explanation, since these riders are supposed to have confessed in 2007-2008, and some even later (are we to think the ex-Gerolsteiner guys were always clean?).
Race Radio said:
Steffen complained in faxes to Weisel that he was losing his job because he refused to allow drugs on the team. “What could a Spanish doctor, completely unknown to the organization, offer that I can’t or won’t,” he wrote, referring to his replacement, Ceyala. “Doping is the fairly obvious answer,” he said. He also warned that Johnny Weltz, the newly hired road manager, was a reputed drug cheat
sniper said:Interesting.
In 1996(?) Prentice criticizes the appointment of a reputed drug cheat named Weltz. Yet no problems with Weltz at Garmin? I know, many years have passed, but still.
has JV ever given any explanation why he wanted Weltz?
EDIT: On the side: Hamilton implicated Weltz, and he recently deliberately singled out Vaughters as a hypocrit. Is it fair to conclude that Hamilton is not a big Garmin/JV fan?
sniper said:Interesting.
In 1996(?) Prentice criticizes the appointment of a reputed drug cheat named Weltz. Yet no problems with Weltz at Garmin? I know, many years have passed, but still.
has JV ever given any explanation why he wanted Weltz?
EDIT: On the side: Hamilton implicated Weltz, and he recently deliberately singled out Vaughters as a hypocrit. Is it fair to conclude that Hamilton is not a big Garmin/JV fan?
thanks. I think this speaks volumes about what Hamilton really thinks.weeniebeenie said:
“I think he’s doing a great job,” Hamilton said. “I don’t know anything about the weekly testing but he’s talking the talk and walking the walk. But to be honest, Jonathan Vaughters, it’s not like he has a dormitory with all his riders in it and he has control of all these guys’ lives. He can preach the preach but it’s still up to the rider but I think he’s doing a great job and I totally support him.”
Agree, I would have bolded the dormitary part to be fair.hrotha said:Bolding "talking the talk" as if "walking the walk" didn't go immediately after it.![]()
hrotha said:Bolding "talking the talk" as if "walking the walk" didn't go immediately after it.![]()
sniper said:the overt message is: "what vaughters says is one story, what his riders do is a completely different story."
the covert message seems: "can't you see through the BS?"
In this case you are sluipschutter.sniper said:And I might be reading too much into it.
sniper said:the overt message is: "what vaughters says is one story, what his riders do is a completely different story."
the covert message seems: "can't you see through the BS?"
Tyler even managed to state Sky are clean somewhere, but in Garmin's case he's apparently more reserved.
Look, Vaughters is smart, charming, anti-doping, gets along with the media, Walsh likes him, etc. so it's not exactly en vogue to criticize Vaughters. that could be one reason why
Tyler's criticism of Garmin/JV seems mostly covert criticism, implicating Weltz, digging up the 2008 Vuelta story without explicitly naming JV (letting others join the dots).
On the other hand, of course he would probably have implicated Weltz regardless of his sentiments towards Vaughters. And I might be reading too much into it.
And I'm not saying Tyler has someinside intel on Garmin. But it's not farfetched to assume the two don't really like eachother. Tbh, Vaughters 2008 Vuelta action speaks volumes. The acts of a bully and of a hypocrit. If I were Tyler, i'd not be very forgiving either.
coinneach said:What??? Calling Hamilton a client of Fuentes? Whats hypocritical about that![]()
What JV did is like pulling somebody's pants down in front of an audience.coinneach said:What??? Calling Hamilton a client of Fuentes? Whats hypocritical about that![]()
Fearless Greg Lemond said:In this case you are sluipschutter.
agreed.The most interesting thing to me is wheter Steffen and Weltz have recognciled, or how does that spell. The big old doper of 1996 versus the anti doping doc.
Perhaps Weltz has seen the light.