Looking for the latest race results? - We got you covered right here!
Arredondo said:It's gonna be an ugly podium. But i think it's going to be a podium.
Tomorrow he will have even more problem to follow Nibali and Chaves. If Kruijswijk is decent, he will even lose time on him in his current state.
Valv.Piti said:Arredondo said:It's gonna be an ugly podium. But i think it's going to be a podium.
Tomorrow he will have even more problem to follow Nibali and Chaves. If Kruijswijk is decent, he will even lose time on him in his current state.
An ugly podium... what does that even mean. LOL.
He got his stage win. He was never going to be a superman in these kinda stages, even tho I had my hopes up, obviously, since the start. I don't really know what you really are on about. Yes, Kruijswijk crashed, but thats about as important or even more important at this point than being able to time trial - descending, staying on your bike. Its not something you should neglect, its a real ability and Valverde is one of the best at that.
I think you have been overly pessimistic and negative in this Giro. I like you and respect you, but I would like to see you a little more positive.Valverde is no superman and you know it. Don't demand too much,
Valv.Piti said:I got you. Sorry for coming off harsh.
If Kruiswijk already is in trouble on Vars, he will have a great time. Majka shouldn't be able to go past him and he will look for an opportunity if anything present itself like he's always done. I doubt he will force anything, but I would be glad to be wrong.
Fernandez said:Valverde has spent his whole career trying to make podiums in GTs, not wins. He has never been a GT winner material; a second tier in these races. Its a pity that he hadnt someone clever at his side when he started his career that guided him in accordance with his abilities. He could have won dozens of GT stages, classics and one week races, instead of hanging on in the top 5 or 10 in every single GT he has raced.
I'm pretty sure Froome, Nibali and Contador wouldn't prefer Piti's palmares over their own.movingtarget said:Fernandez said:Valverde has spent his whole career trying to make podiums in GTs, not wins. He has never been a GT winner material; a second tier in these races. Its a pity that he hadnt someone clever at his side when he started his career that guided him in accordance with his abilities. He could have won dozens of GT stages, classics and one week races, instead of hanging on in the top 5 or 10 in every single GT he has raced.
Didn't he win the Vuelta in 2009 ? Still the most versatile rider of his generation. Name a rider who would not like his win record ? The only thing missing is a win at the Worlds and he podiumed a couple.
LaFlorecita said:I'm pretty sure Froome, Nibali and Contador wouldn't prefer Piti's palmares over their own.movingtarget said:Fernandez said:Valverde has spent his whole career trying to make podiums in GTs, not wins. He has never been a GT winner material; a second tier in these races. Its a pity that he hadnt someone clever at his side when he started his career that guided him in accordance with his abilities. He could have won dozens of GT stages, classics and one week races, instead of hanging on in the top 5 or 10 in every single GT he has raced.
Didn't he win the Vuelta in 2009 ? Still the most versatile rider of his generation. Name a rider who would not like his win record ? The only thing missing is a win at the Worlds and he podiumed a couple.
Mr.White said:LaFlorecita said:I'm pretty sure Froome, Nibali and Contador wouldn't prefer Piti's palmares over their own.movingtarget said:Fernandez said:Valverde has spent his whole career trying to make podiums in GTs, not wins. He has never been a GT winner material; a second tier in these races. Its a pity that he hadnt someone clever at his side when he started his career that guided him in accordance with his abilities. He could have won dozens of GT stages, classics and one week races, instead of hanging on in the top 5 or 10 in every single GT he has raced.
Didn't he win the Vuelta in 2009 ? Still the most versatile rider of his generation. Name a rider who would not like his win record ? The only thing missing is a win at the Worlds and he podiumed a couple.
So Froome and Nibali have better palmares than Valverde?Get real!
LaFlorecita said:I'm pretty sure Froome, Nibali and Contador wouldn't prefer Piti's palmares over their own.movingtarget said:Fernandez said:Valverde has spent his whole career trying to make podiums in GTs, not wins. He has never been a GT winner material; a second tier in these races. Its a pity that he hadnt someone clever at his side when he started his career that guided him in accordance with his abilities. He could have won dozens of GT stages, classics and one week races, instead of hanging on in the top 5 or 10 in every single GT he has raced.
Didn't he win the Vuelta in 2009 ? Still the most versatile rider of his generation. Name a rider who would not like his win record ? The only thing missing is a win at the Worlds and he podiumed a couple.
Fernandez said:What I mean is that Valverde has underachieved by far his cycling abilities/posibilities. He shouldnt have focused so obsessively in GT podiums. He could have won 2 stages in every GT he has ridden and even have gotten a top ten, instead of fighting for the podium and barely winning few stages.
Mr.White said:As for palmares, the best one is Contador's among active riders. Then Boonen, Cancellara and Valverde. After that three comes Nibali. The rest are behind