Re: Re:
I'm not sure why a statement is needed. Valverde may be leader, but surely Quintana's role in the race is to gain conditioning for himself with the Tour de France in mind. He's not really a useful domestique in these kind of stages, other than to perhaps offer some assistance on the toughest climbs (the hardest of which was cancelled anyway). I guess he is being allowed to ride his own race and build his form independently, but only when that started to threaten Valverde's GC, he was asked to just sit tight. Which he appeared to do immediately.Blanco said:DFA123 said:I think you're reading too much into it. There are only seven man teams now and Movistar have three guys who could be leader, or were designed to be useful in the tough mountains. That only leaves four riders to control the rest of the race and one of those (Pedrero) isn't very strong. There is a limit to how much you can control a race in those circumstances. Sending Quintana in a break, and establishing a small gap with it, forced the other teams to work and gave Movistar an easy ride.Blanco said:DFA123 said:It worked out well for Movistar in the end, whether intentional or not. They basically had a free ride for most of the day, when they normally would have been expected to be on the front for most of the tough parts. While Pinot, Yates and Sky all ended up putting in a pretty big effort for very little reward in the last 10km.
Quintana probably just wanted to put in a solid training effort - get in a decent interval, which he would have already pencilled into his schedule with the Vallter finish. But when it looked like the gap was getting too big because of the lack of response behind, he immediately stopped working, which seems fair enough.
Yeah, you put it up nicely, but it was not all that great. In fact it was not good at all, it was bad display of whole Movistar team. They were disorganized, without a clear plan, it seemed like it was every man for himself. I mean, why Soler attacked in the first place. What was to gain form that move? Is it a team order? If yes, what was the idea behind that? I can't see any positive aspect of that move. The other thing, about Quintana, he only stopped when heard yelling at the radio, that was clear after his post-race comments. He either has no brains or he just doesn't care, and I think it was the latter. He should've acted as a stopper from the beginning, this way that move wouldn't gain significant advantage. There was no benefit for the team from his riding. His riding would eliminate Valverde and gave the race to Yates. Something was really wrong with Movistar yesterday.
If there was any mutiny in the team then Quintana wouldn't have stopped riding when the gap started to grow out a bit too much.
To me the clear sign that something was wrong is lack of statements from the team and Valverde himself. Quintana only said that DS stopped him from riding, and that Valverde is the leader, but he seemed quite unhappy about that.