Re: Re:
Ventoux isn't really high altitude, nor is it in the Alps... I understand what you mean tho, but needless to say I do not agree with it.JS10 said:No It was me who got my facts wrong.I should have said Stage15 2013 Valverde conceded 2.32 to Froome on theValv.Piti said:Correct me If Im wrong, but that was 2007 and he did very well.JS10 said:You are obviously forgetting Valverde"s last experience with the Gallibier.Froome &co would have shelled him out with the rest and you don't concede seconds there, only minutes.Tonton said:Valverde could have won this Tour. No doubt. Won the Matthews murito and the Bardet's stage. Just wasn't meant to be.Valv.Piti said:If it wasn't obvious before the Tour this was his race to win, it definitely is after the race. Every argument we used to argue his case proved to be right, probably even more than we could have imagined. It just sucks. It just sucks so hard........
Ventoux.The point I wished to make is that Valverde is liable to struggle on long high altitude Alpine Stages