Yes. Classic.
In fairness, Caitlin appears to have reacted to the concern and adwords are no longer on the site:
Here is the link:
http://thecatlinperspective.wordpress.com
I am not here to defend Caitlin, but tweeting the three-week-old steroidreport article at the present time without checking on status at Caitlin's site is endorsing something that no longer appears to be true. Corrective tweet called for?
Seems prejudicial when corrective action has been taken, don't you think?
And, in minor bone to pick, it would have been nice if the criticizing article on sterroid report had provided an html link to the Caitlin site - rather than simply spelling out the name of the blog.
Moreover, the steroidreport could have asked Caitlin for comment (like a real news source) and/or updated the blog post or noted in the comments that the Adwords links are no longer present.
He does clearly advertise his services to help 'fix' sites such as Caitlin's, and it would have made sense to contact Don to help him fix this if it were a sincere offer:
Without contact Don, providing a correction, or noting the change, it is a bit more like sticking his tongue out at him while claiming to be a friend.
Dave.