Thanks. It is funny how those who agree with me seem to speak and think logically, while those who disagree sound like children, some just want to believe Lance is guilty or everyone is guilty.
If everyone is guilty, then Landis deserves his 'win' back.
Also, just because there is an "investigation", how could that possibly "prove" there is guilt? Dumb conclusion (from page 1 )
As to the administrator, this is new. The Landis interview is new. Even M. Bogerd agrees with me that these are lies, quoted today. If you are an administrator, we don't need your opinion. Delete a few of the trolls here, but let us have our own discussions without some 'supervisor' thinking he knows better than all of us. You should be fired for threatening a poster who sees Landis is untrustworthy.
If everyone is guilty, then Landis deserves his 'win' back.
Also, just because there is an "investigation", how could that possibly "prove" there is guilt? Dumb conclusion (from page 1 )
As to the administrator, this is new. The Landis interview is new. Even M. Bogerd agrees with me that these are lies, quoted today. If you are an administrator, we don't need your opinion. Delete a few of the trolls here, but let us have our own discussions without some 'supervisor' thinking he knows better than all of us. You should be fired for threatening a poster who sees Landis is untrustworthy.