iZnoGouD said:What?? Do you think Wiggins is afraid of Contador?
Last year Wiggins was at another level
Eshnar said:For a guy with the ego of Wiggins it is plain impossible to back up after saying he's going for the Giro as primary goal.
airstream said:Contador can be different too. They both may be different. Yes, if Contador will show up at the 2009 Tour level, it is extremely difficult to imagine Wiggins winning. But to say 'Wiggins has no chance' is way over.
IMO, people generally underrate defensive riding that Wiggins promotes, confusing visual show and effectiveness. It is like blanket stereotype which I can not understand. True, Wiggins is dependent on the team rider, but people tend to absolutize this. Nonetheless, all that was discussed numerous times and I have nothing new to say.
And when the road tilted up, that level was a notch or two below Froome and a further notch behind Contador.iZnoGouD said:Last year Wiggins was at another level
ferryman said:Man you are a case. You abandoned our boy Andy cos he didn't have it to beat Bertie, you got on the Froome train cos you thought he could beat Bertie, now you are just about to get on the Wiggins train if I read where you are going with this.
And yes totally agree, you have nothing new to say.
The Hitch said:You guys actually believed he was an Andy fan? He only ever pretended to be an Andy fan because last year a lot of Contador fans were really hateful of Andy.
He never actually defended Andy if he was compared to other riders or talked him up in any thread that wasnt about Contador.
He has been willing put down Andy Schleck in a heartbeat if he feels Contador fans are defending him or if people are talking up his performances at the 2009 and 2010 Tours because Contador was there.
airstream said:Contador can be different too. They both may be different. Yes, if Contador will show up at the 2009 Tour level, it is extremely difficult to imagine Wiggins winning. But to say 'Wiggins has no chance' is way over.
IMO, people generally underrate defensive riding that Wiggins promotes, confusing visual show and effectiveness. It is like blanket stereotype which I can not understand. True, Wiggins is dependent on the team rider, but people tend to absolutize this. Nonetheless, all that was discussed numerous times and I have nothing new to say.
the asian said:Pretty much this. Leaving enough time for recovery before Tour![]()
Froome to be his slave for the 2nd year running.
jilbiker said:Wiggins on pure talent is not in the same category as AC. Wiggins admits that also. Last year's "wins" were from the compensation of the Sky train. That train is back to the 2009 level in my opinion with the exit of some notable clinic related names. Actually I rate Wiggins below Nibali, Purito, Basso, the list continues.....
ferryman said:Man you are a case. You abandoned our boy Andy cos he didn't have it to beat Bertie, you got on the Froome train cos you thought he could beat Bertie, now you are just about to get on the Wiggins train if I read where you are going with this.
And yes totally agree, you have nothing new to say.
It is conventionality and not a guarantee of defeat. Going by talent, everyone should surrender straight on the start, no?jilbiker said:Wiggins on pure talent is not in the same category as AC. Wiggins admits that also.
It is wrong to explain everything by the train. Wiggins was very strong himself. He was the second climber in the race, after Froome.Last year's "wins" were from the compensation of the Sky train.
Today Wiggins is a much better time trialist than in 2009. And even back then he was a very good climber, considering how much he had to work at the front. Wiggins had back up only on Le Grand Bornard stage. On the rest stages he defended very decently looking into account that it was his debut like a GC contender. But again he improved as a climber too.That train is back to the 2009 level in my opinion with the exit of some notable clinic related names.
The reason?Actually I rate Wiggins below Nibali, Purito, Basso, the list continues.....
airstream said:It is conventionality and not a guarantee of defeat. Going by talent, everyone should surrender straight on the start, no?
It is wrong to explain everything by the train. Wiggins was very strong himself. He was the second climber in the race, after Froome.
Today Wiggins is a much better time trialist than in 2009. And even back then he was a very good climber, considering how much he had to work at the front. Wiggins had back up only on Le Grand Bornard stage. On the rest stages he defended very decently looking into account that it was his debut like a GC contender. But again he improved as a climber too.
The reason?
My logic is Contador won't be able to win a pure class if Wiggins will show up at 2012 level. Moreover it will be very difficult to win if Wiggins turns out to be the second climber in the race. It's very hard to gain time by miles alone even for Contador.
In all the years: Contador won alone:
- 45 sec on Verbier;
- 50 (?) sec on Angliru;
All the rest was gain with one's help. Contador needs cooperations, he needs the guys who will be very good (better than Wiggins) climbers. Nibali and Basso will be stronger than Wiggins? I'm not sure.