I have no trouble imagining just that. We're already seeing it. He's simply not talking about Sky, or hardly, unless he's asked about it in a Q&A session.Wingmanrob said:It was a talk about his book and doping in cycling largely from when he became involved with the Armstrong story. It was a talk arranged by Portsmouth University.
Yeah he did mention Leinders but not in any great detail, also mentioned Tenerife too. But he was pressed on the conflict on interest and he was adament that he's got free reign. I also cant imagine that a reporter with his reputation would risk ruining it by working for a company where his reporting was restricted. He'd lose all credibility.
He's concentrating on Lance. On the past.
He's entitled to, of course.
Didn't he just get a behind-the-scenes freecard from Sky? There is one team that is apparently not afraid of Walsh. I wonder why.Fearless Greg Lemond said:People, David Walsh is no longer dependend of his newspaper job. Get real. No bandwagon. Pro cycling teams are scared of him. As they should. He connects real dots. Real people/cyclists talk to him.