• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Itzulia Basque Country 2025, April 7th-12th

Page 20 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I love this.
I love a loophole like this. Reminds me of this time I won a paper airplane competition by just wrapping my paper around a stone and lobbing it across the room.
Or when my school held a competition to see who could carry the most footballs without their hands and I just tied the arms and hood of my sweater together and used it as a bag.
What I wanna say is: "I love it when a plan comes together".
 
View: https://x.com/ehitzulia/status/1910022880735473815


"Following the initial footage received, the decision was made to disqualify rider number 51 for 'Deviation from the race route to gain an advantage', as the images appeared to show that the rider had taken the roundabout in a manner that strayed from the signposted course.

However, after receiving and reviewing various pieces of evidence, including data from Veloviewer, the route book, and information provided by the team, it has been confirmed that all the available information indicated that the roundabout in question was supposed to be taken in the way chosen by the Cofidis team rider.

According to Article 1.2.064 of the UCI regulations, 'Riders must study the course in advance.' In this case, the rider correctly followed the planned route.

Furthermore, the advantage gained by the rider after exiting the roundabout continued to increase all the way to the finish line.

The organiser was also consulted and confirmed that there had been a signage error at that roundabout.

For all these reasons, the College of Commissaires has decided to overturn its initial decision and to validate the rider's passage over the finish line."
 
View: https://x.com/ehitzulia/status/1910022880735473815


"Following the initial footage received, the decision was made to disqualify rider number 51 for 'Deviation from the race route to gain an advantage', as the images appeared to show that the rider had taken the roundabout in a manner that strayed from the signposted course.

However, after receiving and reviewing various pieces of evidence, including data from Veloviewer, the route book, and information provided by the team, it has been confirmed that all the available information indicated that the roundabout in question was supposed to be taken in the way chosen by the Cofidis team rider.

According to Article 1.2.064 of the UCI regulations, 'Riders must study the course in advance.' In this case, the rider correctly followed the planned route.

Furthermore, the advantage gained by the rider after exiting the roundabout continued to increase all the way to the finish line.

The organiser was also consulted and confirmed that there had been a signage error at that roundabout.

For all these reasons, the College of Commissaires has decided to overturn its initial decision and to validate the rider's passage over the finish line."

I can understand some of the reasoning, but the fact that his gap continued to grow should obviously not be taken into consideration since that was clearly a result of the indicent.
 
Does anyone have the Algarve book handy? Specifically stage 1.
I posted the image from the road book here:

They showed the correct way to take the roundabouts in the infamous stage 1 of Algarve.

Oo4e6Bo.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: noob and Tim Cahill

Latest posts