Jalabert positive for EPO in 1998 TDF

Page 10 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
hrotha said:
I disagree. It will finally expose some players, which might trigger a domino effect which might lead to the enablers.

Thats the problem. It "might".

And looking at it realistically the chances are exceedingly slim. We know the main players already, they will either deny or confirm their doping.
There is no incentive or penalty to reveal more.
 
Mar 13, 2009
2,932
55
11,580
Dr. Maserati said:
There is no "if" - releasing the names only without going after the enablers has no effect on anti-doping.


Seriously, good luck with that. Unless you are that person I would not have total confidence in anyone, even some riders I know quite well.
I do genuinely hope that it does highlight clean riders and that your names rider is on that list.
But doping was a systematic problem, naming individual dopers is sensationalism, nothing to do with anti-doping.

Although I partly agree with you, revealing the names will stop hypocrites like Jalabert from practicing omerta and essentially encouraging the status quo.

If "clean" riders are identified, this is a bonus.
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,859
1,271
20,680
Race Radio said:
It is the Alp d'Huez stage of the Tour.

To be fair Jaja testified in May and the timeline has always been sometime in July

Kind of guaranties that people will notice.:rolleyes:
 
May 15, 2011
2,817
39
11,530
finally ready to admit the truth, all bit late now really, hardly was clean riding with festina.
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
All this is great, catch dopers, BUT!

This is also a huge smoke screen to what is going on now, can't we let the Jaja '98 thing go and put it on schedule for the Winter when we're bored and then concentrate on this up and coming huge race and what is being done to prevent it again? No, instead the media is going to side step what is really important, catch them in the act, the dots are all there layed out and still the media ignores them, but come 15 years from now they'll say, "I knew it all along! Those darn tricky dopers thought they'd get away with it!", OK Scherlock how about this year?

:rolleyes:
 
Jul 29, 2010
1,440
0
10,480
Race Radio said:
Good luck with that.

The numbers confirm what most already knew. In 99 riders came into the race hot but few had the cajones to bring EPO into the country.....except one guy, who makes up the majority of the positives in the 3rd week.

The bigger question is who else is on the list? Pantani for sure but who else?

I see some old french pro is trying to get the data from the hearing held. I hope he is successful. This information is useless in terms of todays race, just an interesting side note in the history of doping.
 
Mar 18, 2009
221
0
0
Benotti69 said:
Wonder what Jaja did to upset someone?

__________________ Too conspiratorial. Perhaps, there was no more perfect lamb to slaughter......
__________________ I can't help but agree with the "old news" part. I may even be said to be
__________________ sympathizing with some of BH's newest exclamations.
 
Mar 18, 2009
221
0
0
JRTinMA said:
I see some old french pro is trying to get the data from the hearing held. I hope he is successful. This information is useless in terms of todays race, just an interesting side note in the history of doping.

That's sorta extreme but I lean that way from time to time.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
How are they connecting the sample codes with rider names? Can they identify non-French riders?
 
Jul 28, 2009
898
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
There is no "if" - releasing the names only without going after the enablers has no effect on anti-doping.
I actually agree in principle that naming individual dopers may have limited benefits. However, in this instance I'm all for it. Jalabert is getting singled out at the moment and while I'm all for his hypocrisy being exposed he is not alone. If all the names came out then we would see where he sits. At the moment he is getting disproportionate attention.

I have always said that the main problem is the enablers basically get off scot free when their culpability is much greater.
 
Feb 10, 2010
10,645
20
22,510
BroDeal said:
How are they connecting the sample codes with rider names? Can they identify non-French riders?

I have zero clue what the process was THEN, but it was only sometime 2012 when samples were made fully anonymous to the lab in WADA's system.

Contador's sample had to be leaked because at some level in the lab names and samples could be matched.. Look at WADA's changes to the software that does all the sample management for evidence of my claim.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
DirtyWorks said:
I have zero clue what the process was THEN, but it was only sometime 2012 when samples were made fully anonymous to the lab in WADA's system.

Contador's sample had to be leaked because at some level in the lab names and samples could be matched.. Look at WADA's changes to the software that does all the sample management for evidence of my claim.

Samples were anonymous in 1999. I assume 1998 was no different.
 
Jul 28, 2009
898
0
0
DirtyWorks said:
I have zero clue what the process was THEN, but it was only sometime 2012 when samples were made fully anonymous to the lab in WADA's system.
Samples are always blinded in the lab. There are various ways of getting IDs which are nearly always corrupt but there are always some people who know everything. Organisations like WADA are always refining these systems to improve their integrity but I don't think it is accurate to say they were made "fully anonymous" in 2012. All lot of the time the refinements are just formalisation of practices which have been in place for many years anyway.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
ToreBear said:
If you think he is a sockpuppet, take it to the mods. If you have a problem with non native english speakers with varying degrees of ability posting here, sorry, not everyone can be born anglo saxon like you.

If you want to learn new and exciting languages, try out this sentence:

Jeg synes at du oppfører deg barnslig nå.

tumblr_lh90vjZXWo1qzlfumo1_500-19655.png
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
BroDeal said:
How are they connecting the sample codes with rider names? Can they identify non-French riders?

I understand they have all the names and they will be in an annex of the report issued July 18th.

If they were able to figure out Jaja then they should be able to figure out all the others
 
Oct 12, 2012
99
0
0
I wonder if they reanalyzed the blood drawn from the TVM team by the french police after their raid on them in 1998 (TVM and Festina both got caught in 1998). They took hair, urine and blood samples but couldn't make it stick as the EPO test had not been validated at the time so the TVM guys (amongst who former Sky DS DeJongh and current DS Sky Knaven) walked.

According to leaked medical reports they were full of EPO, amphetamines, anobol & corticosteroids and cannabis
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Boardman on itv talking briefly on Armstrong. Doesn't seem like someone who has anything to fear from an epo test being released. Im guessing he wont be 1 of the 48.
 
Mar 6, 2009
4,601
503
17,080
The Hitch said:
Boardman on itv talking briefly on Armstrong. Doesn't seem like someone who has anything to fear from an epo test being released. Im guessing he wont be 1 of the 48.

Yes, it will be interesting to see if Boardman is clean of EPO. It might demonstrate what a clean athlete could achieve during the EPO era. Maybe we should start a bookie on this. Will Boardman be on the list for taking EPO.
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,845
0
10,480
pmcg76 said:
Yes, it will be interesting to see if Boardman is clean of EPO. It might demonstrate what a clean athlete could achieve during the EPO era. Maybe we should start a bookie on this. Will Boardman be on the list for taking EPO.

He will be clean, put me down for a fiver....