Jalabert positive for EPO in 1998 TDF

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 19, 2010
1,845
0
10,480
gillan1969 said:
The world has moved on and its different now falls over flat when assessed against Brunyels tweets regarding how it was basically Landis, and only Landis, that brought them down. i.. none of the other actors had it in them to expose the fraud....doesn't exactly fill you with confidence in the system then regarding anyone currently riding as its the same people policing the system as it was then.....
so without a pe**ed off Foyd policing world cycling, where is the disincentive not to get on the programme????

Well just about every rider who has won anything in the past 20 years has been busted ,including Landis, and that doesn't happen by magic....
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,845
0
10,480
Dr. Maserati said:
While you are trying to be smart, it again misses the key issue.

Any rider tested who was clean will only be interested in having their name cleared and those riders should be recognised and applauded.

Sorry Doc, I forgot that YOUR issue, has to be the KEY issue.
Someone needs to send me the meeting agenda next time..tsk..tsk...
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
andy1234 said:
Sorry Doc, I forgot that YOUR issue, has to be the KEY issue.
Someone needs to send me the meeting agenda next time..tsk..tsk...
Anti-doping is the issue, always has been Andy.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
gillan1969 said:
The world has moved on and its different now falls over flat when assessed against Brunyels tweets regarding how it was basically Landis, and only Landis, that brought them down. i.. none of the other actors had it in them to expose the fraud....doesn't exactly fill you with confidence in the system then regarding anyone currently riding as its the same people policing the system as it was then.....
so without a pe**ed off Foyd policing world cycling, where is the disincentive not to get on the programme????

The world has not moved on. With the exceptions of Saiz and Bruyneel there are a whole plethora of people still involved in the sport.

I still have not see any real change.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
ToreBear said:
The policing system is different now than it was. And remember Floyd as the winner of TDF got busted at the end of the back then era. Would that have happened in the 90s? doubt it.

Not it is not. The UCI police the sport. Nothing has changed. Looked at Contador's positive for Clen compared to Li Fuyu.
 
Dec 7, 2010
8,770
3
0
Benotti69 said:
Not it is not. The UCI police the sport. Nothing has changed. Looked at Contador's positive for Clen compared to Li Fuyu.

Yeah Clenquistadors positif was treated and looked at differently than Fuyu's. Sad thing is ...just like you say "The UCI police the sport. Nothing has changed."
 
Nov 12, 2010
4,253
1,314
18,680
Benotti69 said:
The world has not moved on. With the exceptions of Saiz and Bruyneel there are a whole plethora of people still involved in the sport.

I still have not see any real change.

Yes i believe that at least 50% of the riders are still doping in some way or the other. They may not dope in important races but sometime during the year it is being done for recovery or preparation. For evidence look at the the number of doping cases in 2013 - still significant.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
Instead of naming the 40 or so riders who used EPO how about naming the DS' and doctors who supplied it and are still in the sport
 
Jan 27, 2012
15,230
2,614
28,180
Race Radio said:
Instead of naming the 40 or so riders who used EPO how about naming the DS' and doctors who supplied it and are still in the sport

All groups should be exposed. Dopers, DSs and the docs.

Important step in the process. Thawing very slowly.
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,845
0
10,480
Race Radio said:
Instead of naming the 40 or so riders who used EPO how about naming the DS' and doctors who supplied it and are still in the sport

You meant as well as, not instead of, surely?
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
andy1234 said:
You meant as well as, not instead of, surely?

Unless you have been living in a cave none of those names will be a surprise to anyone. Doctors and DS' poison dozens of riders over the years but it is always the riders who get pushed out of the sport, seldom the DS or the doctor
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,845
0
10,480
Race Radio said:
Unless you have been living in a cave none of those names will be a surprise to anyone. Doctors and DS' poison dozens of riders over the years but it is always the riders who get pushed out of the sport, seldom the DS or the doctor

Which is why I said "as well as"....

Instead of, sounds like you don't want these riders to be revealed.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
andy1234 said:
sounds like you don't want these riders to be revealed.

Oh yes. I'm quite sure that is RR's intent. Has to be! It's so obvious! :rolleyes:


How about this:
Given a choice, which would be more useful and effective for the sport.
Naming the riders (from mostly long ago), or naming the doctors and DS' "who supplied it and are still in the sport"?

(notice the use of quotations to highlight RR's actual quote)
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Race Radio said:
Instead of naming the 40 or so riders who used EPO how about naming the DS' and doctors who supplied it and are still in the sport

How about the up to 40 riders come forward to AFLD and WADA and name the doctors and DS' and then riders shall remain nameless?
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,845
0
10,480
Granville57 said:
Oh yes. I'm quite sure that is RR's intent. Has to be! It's so obvious! :rolleyes:


How about this:
Given a choice, which would be more useful and effective for the sport.
Naming the riders (from mostly long ago), or naming the doctors and DS' "who supplied it and are still in the sport"?

(notice the use of quotations to highlight RR's actual quote)

I didn't realise that there was a choice to be made.
As far as I am aware, this revelation doesnt have to be made at the expense of any other action.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
andy1234 said:
I didn't realise that there was a choice to be made.
As far as I am aware, this revelation doesnt have to be made at the expense of any other action.

It doesn't - but if all that is released is the names of the dopers then nothing of any use will be achieved. How many riders have the Senate interviewed? How many Doc's or DS's?

Even Benotti has put his thinking cap on and can see what use having the names could do if the purpose was to indeed be anti-doping.
 
Aug 12, 2012
6,996
1,011
20,680
I have read Mr Clean today about Jalabert.... he talk at the end to be careful stiil with doping, and specially he talk about France... I think he was thinking in Dauphiné, his favourite race, and he could talk about Dani Navarro, and Dani Moreno as well, their flat ITT were amazing for climbers, even if they were peaking there and other not.

Maybe he could be talking as well of Europcar, who knows

it is good when people like him say: ey, this could not be clean...becouse the new now it is that could not be clean, so it is mostly clean, in the past the news were like his case: hey, here, in Festina, there is a man that doesnt dope!!...

We need always to fight, becouse antidoping now works better, but is possible to dope, not too much, but enough to a good result if most of people dont do.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
andy1234 said:
I didn't realise that there was a choice to be made.
As far as I am aware, this revelation doesnt have to be made at the expense of any other action.

There isn't. Only the riders will be exposed. That is a travesty.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Taxus4a said:
I have read Mr Clean today about Jalabert.... he talk at the end to be careful stiil with doping, and specially he talk about France... I think he was thinking in Dauphiné, his favourite race, and he could talk about Dani Navarro, and Dani Moreno as well, their flat ITT were amazing for climbers, even if they were peaking there and other not.

Maybe he could talk as well of Europcar, but difficult to say...

it is good when people like him say: ey, this could not be clean...becouse the new now it is that could not be clean, so it is mostly clean, in the past the news were like his case: hey, here, in Festina, there is a man that doesnt dope!!...

We need always to fight, becouse antidoping now works better, but is possible to dope, not too much, but enough to a good result if most of people dont do.

Do everyone a favor and post in your native language. It will be more comprehensible even to those who don't speak your language.
 
Aug 7, 2010
1,247
0
0
ChewbaccaD said:
Do everyone a favor and post in your native language. It will be more comprehensible even to those who don't speak your language.

My guess is French since I know a bit about French. Could be a real guy or a meat puppet. Turn up the BBQ.....

Mais franchement, defendre a nouveau les tricheurs devient tres tres fatiguee...