• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Jonas Vingegaard Rasmussen, the new alpha mutant

Page 44 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Is French uniquely suited to accuse peopel of doping?

You don't need to speak French (or whatever language) to say or understand 'wtf' when Wout van Aert finishes 2:51 behind the winner over a 22.4km rolling, hilly ITT.

It's science-fiction & absolutely nothing could prepare any of us for what happened. Vayer has his obvious issues but even a broken clock is right twice a day.
 
The Russians were doping in athletics for years. They weren't crushing everyone. Doping doesn't explain this. Whatever is happening, it is much more significant than doping.

There are numerous examples of nations falling massively behind after doping revelations though. China in swimming for instance. And the US, France and Italy in cycling. Btw, Denmark also had some weak years in cycling following the cases of Riis and Rasmussen - but that has changed, as we know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrSahl
You can't really compare it to Indurain because that was still the old school GC era where Indurain was never the best climber in the entire peloton while he was crushing ITTs.

Yeah, back then small thin climbers were losing to tall muscular guys in TTs. That stopped with Froome.
No one was ever able to explain why GC contenders were beating TT specialists in the third week of the TdF. And now they aren't just beating them, they are crushing them by many minutes.

Imagine Pantani beating Ullrich by minutes on a flat TT!

Or imagine a 65kg female boxer beat Tyson Fury. If the laws of physics no longer seem to be valid, no PED can explain that.
 
Yeah, back then small thin climbers were losing to tall muscular guys in TTs. That stopped with Froome.
No one was ever able to explain why GC contenders were beating TT specialists in the third week of the TdF. And now they aren't just beating them, they are crushing them by many minutes.

Imagine Pantani beating Ullrich by minutes on a flat TT!
I think it more stopped with Armstrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shalgo
Yeah, back then small thin climbers were losing to tall muscular guys in TTs. That stopped with Froome.
No one was ever able to explain why GC contenders were beating TT specialists in the third week of the TdF. And now they aren't just beating them, they are crushing them by many minutes.

Imagine Pantani beating Ullrich by minutes on a flat TT!

Or imagine a 65kg female boxer beat Tyson Fury. If the laws of physics no longer seem to be valid, no PED can explain that.
Didn’t Contador smash time trials too
 
Yeah, back then small thin climbers were losing to tall muscular guys in TTs. That stopped with Froome.
No one was ever able to explain why GC contenders were beating TT specialists in the third week of the TdF. And now they aren't just beating them, they are crushing them by many minutes.

Imagine Pantani beating Ullrich by minutes on a flat TT!

Or imagine a 65kg female boxer beat Tyson Fury. If the laws of physics no longer seem to be valid, no PED can explain that.
i still remember a 1998 TT where pantani finished 3rd and that was WHOA because he wasnt a good TT at all

but those were cleaner times :rolleyes: