But your self awareness is very good, compared to others.It is everything I feared in my most doomsday predictions.
And as you well know, my most pressimistic outlooks can be, well, pretty pessimistic.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
But your self awareness is very good, compared to others.It is everything I feared in my most doomsday predictions.
And as you well know, my most pressimistic outlooks can be, well, pretty pessimistic.
I'd imagine (we don't know) but it will be a much smaller calendar.
I think the idea is that you have the best riders competing in the biggest races. A nightmare for the cycling purists, but from a marketing standpoint it makes more sense than what they're doing now: mostly avoiding each other. Just like the Champions League has killed the charm of football, but has made it very marketable.How can anybody think that would be a good idea?
I would imagine the stakeholders (Bakala and Kok + those investing) would essentially buy the rights to a selection of races. As currently happens UCI's ranking continues as largely just a consequence ranking not a real ranking but the Super League series of races are run within the UCI Calendar with separate TV rights etc and the overally winner is the team with most points. Hence joining the best GT & best Classics squad together is almost guaranteed to win and return investment for Bakala & Kok + Lefevere & Plugge no doubt.I don't believe any of the big races wants to be part of that. Starting with the Tour, who in my opinion gains nothing with it, in sporting terms (the biggest stars already want to start it every time, nothing would change regarding that) and possibily in TV rights that would be connected to the new series.
The Giro might want to join it but I also doubt because this series would in my opinion also bring another dreadful thing - if they want the riders to ride every race, no more 3 week GTs. We would get instead the 2 week GTs that some people are already talking about.
Yes, but this wouldn‘t be the Champions League because there, teams still compete in other competitions, while that would be impossible if all the big riders did all the big races in the Cycling Super League.I think the idea is that you have the best riders competing in the biggest races. A nightmare for the cycling purists, but from a marketing standpoint it makes more sense than what they're doing now: mostly avoiding each other. Just like the Champions League has killed the charm of football, but has made it very marketable.
I would imagine the stakeholders (Bakala and Kok + those investing) would essentially buy the rights to a selection of races. As currently happens UCI's ranking continues as largely just a consequence ranking not a real ranking but the Super League series of races are run within the UCI Calendar with separate TV rights etc and the overally winner is the team with most points. Hence joining the best GT & best Classics squad together is almost guaranteed to win and return investment for Bakala & Kok + Lefevere & Plugge no doubt.
The problem would be that it would kill off the organisation of a lot of those ProSeries level and mid-tier races which, while they aren't as important and can attract a decent field still, would be frozen out of having any of those marketable top tier stars who they may have a level of reliance on to attract sponsors to cover organisational costs.I think the idea is that you have the best riders competing in the biggest races. A nightmare for the cycling purists, but from a marketing standpoint it makes more sense than what they're doing now: mostly avoiding each other. Just like the Champions League has killed the charm of football, but has made it very marketable.
These nunbers surrounding the team's budget should a merger happen are huge
Visma - €20m
Amazon - €15m conflicting reports of them being a title or co-sponsor
Specialized - €15m
Soudal - €??
🤯
Fusieteam gaat vol voor Remco: Jumbo-Visma en Evenepoel zaten al rond tafel, snel duidelijkheid verwacht over superfusie
‘The sky’ lijkt ‘the limit’ voor Richard Plugge en co in het fusieverhaal op het allerhoogste wielerniveau. Visma leidt de dans. Amazon sluit alvast aan. Volgt Soudal? Groot ‘target’ wordt ook fietsenconstructeur Specialized. En wie Specialized zegt, denkt... Remco Evenepoel. Jumbo-Visma en de...www.hln.be
True, but Bakala & Kok are Ratlcliffe-level of wealth ie $Billions, Plugge is head of AIGCPI remain sceptic. That sounds a lot like what Velon was created for and almost a decade later I can say that cycling would be the same with or without Velon. It didn't went past a fringe organization which even nowadays I don't know what they do of tangible action to grow cycling.
Their supposed groundbreaking series, the dreadful Hammer Series, never went past of being a mockery of the sport and never got to be more of a joke.
So they dug out some wildly optimistic Irish journalism from five years ago and explained that it would cost 5 million to recruit Eddie Dunbar.I am interested in how competitive Jayco are in their pitch to get Roglic - The back story is that when Alula visited the TDF they fell in love with the race and pressed jayco management how much it would cost to get a Roglic type rider who could possibly win the TDF - Apparently a certain allocation of money was added to the normal budget if this opportunity presented itself. The money is there !
Chris Woerts is known as someone who doesn't exactly stick to the facts, and moreover he doesn't know much about cycling. I wouldn't take these numbers too seriously, even though they suit your narrative. He's been saying similar things about football club Feyenoord, for a decade now, and none of it has come to fruition."OMG Jumbo can't find sponsors"
So they dug out some wildly optimistic Irish journalism from five years ago and explained that it would cost 5 million to recruit Eddie Dunbar.
I think the idea is that you have the best riders competing in the biggest races. A nightmare for the cycling purists, but from a marketing standpoint it makes more sense than what they're doing now: mostly avoiding each other. Just like the Champions League has killed the charm of football, but has made it very marketable.
"OMG Jumbo can't find sponsors"
New team | Sold/Leave | Buyout/Leave | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Ineos/Movistar | MASNADA Fausto, 2024 | |||
| ALAPHILIPPE Julian, 2024 | French team? |
| |||
| TRATNIK Jan, 2024 | UAE? |
| |||
|
| |||||
| BASTIAENS Ayco, 2025 | |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| HUBY Antoine, 2025 | |||||
|
| |||||
| VANGHELUWE Warre, 2025 | |||||
| WARLOP Jordi, 2025 | |||||
VAN BAARLE Dylan | HOFSTEDE Lennard, 2024 | |||||
JORGENSON Matteo | BOUWMAN Koen, 2024 | |||||
ASGREEN Kasper | Leave? If no JBV get buyout | VADER Milan, 2024 | ||||
LAPORTE Christophe | VAN DIJKE Mick, 2024 | |||||
LAMPAERT Yves | VAN DIJKE Tim, 2024 | |||||
BENOOT Tiesj | HESSMANN Michel, 2024 | |||||
KOOIJ Olav | ||||||
MERLIER Tim | Leave? If no JBV get buyout | |||||
CATTANEO Mattia | Leave? If no JBV get buyout | |||||
AFFINI Edoardo | ||||||
VERVAEKE Louis | Leave? If no JBV get buyout | |||||
TULETT Ben | ||||||
VAN DER SANDE Tosh | ||||||
HAGENES Per Strand | ||||||
STAUNE-MITTET Johannes | ||||||
VAN BELLE Loe | ||||||
LECERF William Junior | Leave? If no JBV get buyout | |||||
GELDERS Gil | Leave? If no JBV get buyout | |||||
GLOAG Thomas | ||||||
Only Jumbo. QS has no money issues, but Lefevere wants out, and this is a good time to exit.For both, and not just QS?