Race Radio said:
Depending on their use Hypertension drugs can be considered doping products. Given that we are talking about an elite group of professional athletes most would agree that the Hypertension drugs were used as a doping product, not because the riders were eating too much bacon.
Hypertension drugs are not doping products. They reduce blood pressure by removing blood volume, reducing the impact of the restricting the blood or reducing max heart rate - none of which would promote any form of athleticism.
They can be used to reduce the blood pressure of someone who has been injected with additional blood or to mask other drugs, but that does not make them a doping product - and my post was pretty clear:
no traces of any doping product have been uncovered on the materials analysed.
For the life of me, I can't figure out why such a statement of fact in a thread requesting facts about this case could possibly be challenged. It's a simple fact, a fact communicated from one of the leading sources for this story. It's almost as if you want the thread retitled "just the facts on the latest Astana doping scandal that make Astana look guilty, leaving out any evidence that might offer the slightest inkling of notion that I'm wrong about that".
and finally, in any group of nine people (nevermind the oodles of staff etc....) it is not at all uncommon for at least one to have hypertension. It hits approximately 1 in 5 Americans, and not all through bad diets.
None of that to say that Astana is innocent. I just posted facts per the request of the OP.