The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
maltiv said:JV doesn't say "Yes, I was doped", because that would undoubtedly lead to negative media coverage from the typical "cycling is the only sport where people dope"- journalists. Instead, what JV does here, is that he says a clear "yes" to the cycling supporters and fans (you don't have to be very smart to realise what he implies), while at the same time, he is stopping the media from making any interesting headlines about it by not admitting it openly.
Winterfold said:Still, in the meantime we can ***** about his clothes like a bunch of fags.
![]()
Winterfold said:Why is this so hard for seemingly intelligent people to comprehend?
Ideology? Sometimes aspects of this forum do seem more like a moral crusade than a pragmatic approach to reducing doping in the sport.
Still, in the meantime we can ***** about his clothes like a bunch of fags.
![]()
BroDeal said:JV or Barton Fink?? You decide.
![]()
Benotti69 said:Garmin are using SRAM this season, what's LA stake in them 15%???
he could have used campag or shimano (like this year) and not given a penny or exposure to LA but no SRAM it is? does that not tell you what JV is about?
doesn't say much for cervelo either![]()
flicker said:When I am tired of being tired I drink FRS. Just a tip from the fat and sassy Lord Armstrong.
JMBeaushrimp said:If you've got to work so hard to create a 'unique image', it probably means that you're either making up for something or distracting from something.
Doofus...
sartain said:Does this comment apply to LA as well?
Benotti69 said:Garmin are using SRAM this season, what's LA stake in them 15%???
he could have used campag or shimano (like this year) and not given a penny or exposure to LA but no SRAM it is? does that not tell you what JV is about?
doesn't say much for cervelo either![]()
_yngve_ said:I'd wager LA's stake is < 5%. If Lehman paid $200MM for 40%, and LA made a "meaningful passive investment...said to be in the millions of dollars", we're probably talking low single digits.
But really, at the end of the day, equipment sponsorships are about what the manufacturer brings to the table (in terms of gear, support, and $$), not who has a minor stake in the company.
Benotti69 said:at the end of day there are 2 other manufacturers without alining your team to someone, no matter how small, who is the biggest fraud in the sport!
Most of the sponsors have also found homes elsewhere. Some at Garmin, some elsewhere. There we tried to also help as much as possible, of course for those who were under contract with CTT for next year as we were obliged to, but also for those who were not as we really get along well with our industry partners and want them to be successful, with or without Cervelo.
Dr. Maserati said:I don't think JV had much choice about accepting SRAM.
According to Gerard Vroomen's blog they were already under contract - so by accepting Cervelo JV was also accepting SRAM.
BroDeal said:Interesting interview with Anthony Tan. Among other things, he discusses the Vaughters.
http://nyvelocity.com/content/interviews/2010/anthony-tan-interview
Having sat on what he's said I accept his position—I even would goes as far to say I respect it—but still do not fully agree with it.
Skandar Akbar said:In that case you had better stock up...... that stuff will be history soon.
BotanyBay said:You'd be amazed how much power and influence a minority partner has in a company when he's also a name-brand celebrity. Lance has pull in this one.