Don´t worry. The ban is in the making...
As I said, law to unfold takes time. In Germany we call it "Die Mühlen der Justiz mahlen langsam".
I'am not worried at all
As i said, in light of recent events, anything but a ban is implausible...
With this I implied that if he was innocent they wouldn't have done as they did with the recent suspension. They are not going to change their minds (even if innocent) on this, so they should give him the ban instead of prolonging this further.. If they after 2-3 years of extensive investigation of the same material can't make a decision, then surely one wonders if "guilty without any reasonable doubt" is plausible... I do not consider the snail-pace in processing this case beeing on the plus-side of the accusers, rather the opposite....
But only those who fall for his tricks. I can´t stand a guy telling his riders "do whatever you want, but don´t get caught". He is a psycho, like all those guys who got rich fast with the win-at-all-cost-approach.
No wonder AC was in the "form of his life" this year, after he showed his true level last year. A 100% turnaround... And then Majka comes off the bench after the Giro to ride all remaining contenders (outside of Nibali from the Vino-Dope-Option-Team) into the ground with a smile in his face. Dopers heaven this TS team...
Well, doing "tricks" seem to historically be a part of this sport.. The fact that
Tinkov is so transparent about it doesn't make him more a theif than other thiefs IMO... I think the issue with Contador and Majka is not so black and white as made above, but further discussion of this probably belongs in other threads..
Better get them (over-the-top-dopers) late than never at all. All good for me... Only with Horner they may take a little too long in my opinion. OTOH, I may should just relax. They´ll get him too. Sooner or later...
I agree that late is better than nothing.. But only when it is a matter of
certain tools and or knowledge not beeing avalible at the time... They are processing old data, and have plenty of ressources to finish this already..
His problem. Not the UCI ones. I guess a guy who makes millions could afford a guy to read toxic BPs, like JV (with wayyy less money in the pockets) for example can (the Horner one which he described as roller-coaster AFAIR)...
Let me say that of course it is any teams responsibility to do a proper vet on any new signing. And of course the big teams have better tools to do this if they want to, obviously.. Now Kreuziger was signed to the 2013 season, one would think Riis had learned his lesson with the Contador signing that somehow developed exectly the same way, just different basis to their cases right.. If the UCI needs several years to hand out a ban then how on earth should the team have any chance of knowing better based on BP data?
Furthermore I do think Riis did his homework, he is not an idiot, and the case of Contador would certainly have scared him off signing a new big guy without doing an extensive risk judgement.. He found the signing to be a good choice, and now like with Contador he's in the Sh1te... I saw you said today that the UCI would be happy to get rid of guys like Riis. I would say this case is further proof of that..
Other than the public belief: UCI is not FIFA. They have to turn every cent twice before spending. I give them the benefit of doubt... BP cases are expensive enough.
I do not care that they have to turn every cent...
If the objective is to cleanse the sport, and if the goal is sincere, they would find a way of at least reducing process time..
Delays are only resulting in doubt and uncertainty in the eye of the public..
Afterall the public is paying by wieving, however naive they may be -they deserve better i think..
"3 -maximum 6 months"... Why? Because the public can´t wait? Better take your time, even if it takes years. But make it waterproof...
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram