Reasoned decision here:
http://www.olympic.cz/upload/files/ROZHODCI-KOMISE-NALEZ-O.pdf
Maybe a kind poster in control of the Czech language can translate some of it to answer (if possible) following questions I have:
1. Is there any specific details as to the "numbers" of the abnormalities?
2. Which specific explanations did the defence give to these abnormalities?
3. They say in the press release that there is no evidence of an anti-doping violation. I know that at least one of RK's experts has been pubilcally arguing the passport is flawed, and to some extent useless..
Is the decision based on a "new" kind of interpretation of the BP and it's validity? If so, then a duplicate of the result in CAS could be a game-changer.
(of course anything of interest that springs to mind would be appreciated)
On another note.. UCI not appealing instantly surprises me a bit.
Since the president himself has jeopardised his credibility on the case, then this hesitation seems a bit weird to me. Why let the news go out that he is clear without immediate response.. Why let the headline of cleared sink in, when it has obviously been a high profile PR-case all the way through.