- Aug 13, 2009
- 12,855
- 1
- 0
No surprise that Wonderboy is not too popular in his home town anymore
http://sebastianbraff.blogspot.de/2012/07/dear-lance-armstrong.html
http://sebastianbraff.blogspot.de/2012/07/dear-lance-armstrong.html
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
yourwelcome said:I'm kind of surprised at that - he's Republican, right?
After LA tweeted (twittered? whatever) an infographic a few weeks ago showing the Republicans being big donors to the superpac opposing the anti-smoking legislation he's been pushing hard for, I half wondered whether the USADA action was payback from the Republicans. 'You're now against us and not with us, buddy - protection withdrawn' etc.
Race Radio said:No surprise that Wonderboy is not too popular in his home town anymore
http://sebastianbraff.blogspot.de/2012/07/dear-lance-armstrong.html
yourwelcome said:I'm kind of surprised at that - he's Republican, right?
After LA tweeted (twittered? whatever) an infographic a few weeks ago showing the Republicans being big donors to the superpac opposing the anti-smoking legislation he's been pushing hard for, I half wondered whether the USADA action was payback from the Republicans. 'You're now against us and not with us, buddy - protection withdrawn' etc.
Race Radio said:When the final book is written it will be very clear which side gave him the most help.
mewmewmew13 said:Hehe...good laugh. Can picture him perfectly berating folks
rhubroma said:This reminds me of the parable about the rich guy who gave tons of his wealth to the poor and the poor woman who gave one cent.
Alpe d'Huez said:Again, this to me isn't so much a debate on how Gates got his money, or how much he could give away. I will try to be more clear. I think to compare or clump together Lance and Gates philanthropic giving and motivation behind their charitable donations is a poor comparison. Lance would be closer to the Koch brothers, if you wish to do that.
Alpe d'Huez said:Again, this to me isn't so much a debate on how Gates got his money, or how much he could give away. I will try to be more clear. I think to compare or clump together Lance and Gates philanthropic giving and motivation behind their charitable donations is a poor comparison. Lance would be closer to the Koch brothers, if you wish to do that.
Alpe d'Huez said:Again, this to me isn't so much a debate on how Gates got his money, or how much he could give away. I will try to be more clear. I think to compare or clump together Lance and Gates philanthropic giving and motivation behind their charitable donations is a poor comparison. Lance would be closer to the Koch brothers, if you wish to do that.
Okay, but that's what the discussion was about, a comparison.rhubroma said:I don't wish to make any comparisons...
My point exactly. And sure, I'm okay with the term "modicum". If one really wants to see a philanthropist, look at Warren Buffett. He still lives in the same 4 bedroom house he raised his family in, and is giving nearly all of his money away, reportedly over 99% of it. If you ask me, that's how all of the .1% should live. But that's another topic for another thread.Lance's giving unlike Bill's, for whom at least a modicum of decency exists, won't earn my praise, because he used his beneficiaries (that is the sick) as a shield of impunity against his crimes.
I wouldn't go quite that far, but understand what you're saying and won't criticize you for your opinion either.Turner29 said:I think a better comparison would be Jerry Sandusky's Second Mile foundation -- created by a sociopath to provide cover and legitimacy to illegal activities.
Turner29 said:I think a better comparison would be Jerry Sandusky's Second Mile foundation -- created by a sociopath to provide cover and legitimacy to illegal activities.
Jeremiah said:Gates' philanthropy is every bit as cynical as Armstrong's and more dangerous.
PR in both cases.
Alpe d'Huez said:I do however find it almost amusing the people that scream no physical evidence exists proving Lance doped and the witnesses are all bitter and have a vendetta. I wonder if these same people would acquit Sandusky or feel he is innocent. After all, there was no physical evidence he raped those boys, and he was convicted almost exclusively on eyewitness and victim testimony.
thehog said:Prop 29 failed. Maybe it was payback on Lance for him comeplety stuffing it up?
Jeremiah said:Gates' philanthropy is every bit as cynical as Armstrong's and more dangerous.
PR in both cases.
D-Queued said:Perhaps you don't like either of them, and you are entitled to your opinion. But these are night and day situations.
One foundation is about to rid us of malaria while more cancer cases means that Lance can charge more appearance fees.
...
I don't know if it belongs in the clinic, but there may be a closer comparison here than you are aware.
There was quite a dialog on the ESPN forums about 1-1/2 years ago about Lance and a 17 year old high school co-ed in Cedar Falls, Iowa in 2007. The alleged incident occurring while he was in town for a cancer benefit.
http://myespn.go.com/s/conversations/show/story/6044270
(You have to sign in to read the discussion, and I am not posting any of it here)
Dave.
Turner29 said:Erm, I did not read or hear anything about that in the link. Did I miss something?
D-Queued said:Did you log in... and follow the thread ?
Dave.
D-Queued said:Did you log in... and follow the thread ?
Dave.
Deagol said: