Yeah, and there was also an
independant Dutch investigation that pretty much evisercated that entire process.
Here it is for you.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/dutch-report-clears-armstrong/2006/06/01/1148956427078.html
http://www.tdfblog.com/2006/06/thoughts_on_the.html
62.50.72.82/imgArchive/Homepage/Rapport%20HR%20zonder.pdf
Now, why would I take one side and simply
ignore the other side if the issue is about EVIDENCE?
Why is it OK for Lance Bashers to universally condem Lance, but then take issue when someone says, "Stop the
pointless bashing!"
If you only want to look at one side of an issue? Your choice.
If you want to focus only on Landis accussations against Lance and ignore everything else and its implication? Your choice.
If you want to put a finger in my chest and demand I simply take you position? Expect a finger right back.
The system MUST use evidence, ALL of it, in reaching conclusions.