- Mar 25, 2013
- 5,389
- 0
- 0
Franklin said:JaJa is being JaJa, a product of his times. I don't understand the shock and outrage, his position has been crystal clear from when he was a cyclist.
But once again I notice something at this forum that annoys me. France questions his athletes and it's still not enough. An athlete only agrees to speak behind closed doors (about something 15 years ago) and somehow this hearing is a joke.
Well, considering the official outrage about Rabo, the senate hearings into Carl Lewis were wideopen and the Inquiries into Linford Christie led to huge judicial action it certainly seems that once again the Latin countries are so much more corrupt
Excuse me for being sick and tired of this nonsense. Instead of applauding France to act people here expect things which are way out of legal bounds. It's about as constructive as a baby throwing out it's toys out of the pram.
Obviously you didn't know that Deschamps testified until I said so. Otherwise you may have heard him say this:
"(I answered) many questions. You know I don't have the right to reveal the content of my hearing, and that applies to the committee members as well,'' Deschamps told reporters afterward.
Deschamps, who played for Italian giant Juventus from 1994-99, was asked if any of the questions related to his time as France captain of the 1998 World Cup-winning team or his successful spell as a combative midfielder with Juve.
"I'm sorry, I can't,'' answer, he said. "There is the issue of confidentiality. I had many questions, but I can't reveal the nature of these questions.''
And that something from 15 years ago was the small matter of winning the World Cup. Why is Jalabert's public and not Deschamps? Both happened around the same period.
Tell me anything constructive that came out of Jalabert's testimony or Deschamps for that matter.
And stop bringing this along nationalistic lines. My judgement on this Senate hearing is done on what has been disclosed so far and not done with prejudice to Latin countries due to some favouritism to English speaking nations. What utter rubbish. This is judged on it's own merits.
I hope we get something contructive out of this hearing. Let's wait and see but on the basis of what I've seen so far, I think I justifiably have doubts. It hasn't been transparent enough regarding the Deschamps testimony.