Again, I think there very likely is an abuse of asthma drugs in the pro peloton. Intravenous use seems like a particular problem. And Yates' use of Terbutaline is definitely a bit sketchy, at the very least.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
vedrafjord said:
As a fellow asthma sufferer (and hopeless amateur racer) my opinion is "yes, absolutely". Clearly there's abuse occurring, but the fairest way to stop that is to look at their medical history - if like me you were diagnosed with asthma age 3 by your family doctor and hospitalised several time growing up, then you're legit. If you were completely fine until a cycling team doctor diagnosed you age 23, absolutely not.
I think that is very correct. Never understood why Salbutamol was legalized in the first place.
The only reason cyclists 'have' asthma is because of the benefits the inhalers give.
same with a lot of other substances
But on the other hand this is bull. Asthma is a
thing. A much bigger thing than doping, to be honest: "approximately 250,000 people die prematurely each year from asthma." Adult-onset asthma is also a
thing. I've had asthma since I was basically a newborn, yet my brother started having problems in his mid-twenties. It's basically only exercise-induced now for me (though any respiratory infections and viruses hit me really hard as well). Today I went all out on a foggy hill super-early and I when I got home I used my inhaler for the first time this year. Meanwhile my brother struggles with it daily. Some drugs work better on some people than others and on different situations. Salbutamol is like magic for me now. Two puffs and I'm gold for the day, sometimes even the year. But when I was a kid I had a collectors' set of inhalers just to get me through some nights.
The abuse of asthma drugs is a problem. But stealing a line from an economics writer, every problem doesn't come into the world along with it's twin, solution.