thehog said:Yes, good article. And well said by Landis.
Bullsnort. The difference, as LeMond states in his comments, is as follows:
“We had a decent relationship, but since 2001 we’ve not had any relationship. I’m not one that holds a grudge but I’m also realistic with who I’m dealing with and he’s not really shown any remorse for what he’s done,” LeMond told members of the Australian press on the morning of the Tour Down Under’s third stage.
“That’s not about doping but about what he’s done to people’s lives, destroyed them. He took a good ten years out of my life. I'd be willing to talk to him under certain circumstances.”
When asked if Armstrong should see his ban reduced, LeMond stated his belief that the former US Postal leader should remain outside of the sport.
"If anyone deserves a life ban…. Ben Johnson got a life ban in 1988 and relative to that he wasn’t involved in the conspiracy to cover up stuff. I don’t think there’s ever been a cyclist who has ever been involved in that level of deception. It’s unfortunate.”
Greg clearly makes a distinction between Armstrong and other dopers. I don't love his silence and apparent blind spot for people like Pantani and others, but I also understand it. Seriously what's the point at this late date and time?
Landis is acting like what Indurain did is equal to what Armstrong did and faulting Greg for not treating them the same.
He's full of ****.