thehog
BANNED
- Jul 27, 2009
- 31,285
- 2
- 22,485
Re: Re:
Whilst that sounds lovely and is big on sentiment is doesn’t get away from the issue of LeMond’s actions post his career end. A lot of what he does is about how to promote “Greg Inc.” No harm in doing that, he is a business man. I don’t think he is actually anti-doping but more PR for the range of investments he has made. No doubt Armstrong was a threat to that and rightly so LeMond fought against and prevailed. I don’t see his actions in other areas in line with being considered “anti-doping’ in the vein of Kimmage for example. Its more in the self-promotion of brand LeMond.
Darn good bike racer I will say. Probably just about the best of that era. As for being clean? 1990 Tour win was probably more of concern than 89 but I don’t think we’ll ever really know.
Bottom line; LeMond will do what's right for LeMond, less what's right for bike racing.
ScienceIsCool said:Lemond is one of those guys who actually, truly loves the sport. It wasn't just a vehicle to support his other ambitions (i.e., guys like Armstrong) - he actually loves the sport. The one which he was ostracized from for nearly a decade. The sport went from dirty to cesspool right about the time he retired, but what's a guy like him supposed to do? In his heart he's still a cyclist and gets a thrill from being "home" at the races that define his passions.Benotti69 said:GJB123 said:Geez, this thread is still going? Who would have thunk?
LeMond reiginited this thread with his love-ins at the TdF with all the lovely nice ex dopers![]()
It would appear with LeMond, USA* dopers bad, rest of world dopers good.
*Especially TdF winners.
In other words, I get how he can be clean, against doping, and yet still want to embrace the sport and all the flawed people around it. Just don't try to ruin him, destroy his reputation and his livelihood because he won't back down. Ever.
John Swanson
Whilst that sounds lovely and is big on sentiment is doesn’t get away from the issue of LeMond’s actions post his career end. A lot of what he does is about how to promote “Greg Inc.” No harm in doing that, he is a business man. I don’t think he is actually anti-doping but more PR for the range of investments he has made. No doubt Armstrong was a threat to that and rightly so LeMond fought against and prevailed. I don’t see his actions in other areas in line with being considered “anti-doping’ in the vein of Kimmage for example. Its more in the self-promotion of brand LeMond.
Darn good bike racer I will say. Probably just about the best of that era. As for being clean? 1990 Tour win was probably more of concern than 89 but I don’t think we’ll ever really know.
Bottom line; LeMond will do what's right for LeMond, less what's right for bike racing.
