I wrote he could maybe fight for second half top ten if not for wet roads. You can easily find it few posts above, read properly instead of talking about delusions....saganboss said:
Same for you as for Saganboss. Anyway I've never said König should lead Giro, neither I've said Contador is holding Kreuziger back. Why are you lying?HelloDolly said:
After this season it is like a dream. He was very good yesterday. Helped Froome a bit and got decent placing for himself. Only shame good old Alejandro is such a good sprinterTMP402 said:
I wonder whether he was called of to ride pace for Froome and what could have been if he did not and could pursue Chaves.
silvergrenade said:
No one knows what happened there exactly. Easy to judge now a make "clever" notes.Jagartrott said:
I am not saying it couldn't be his fault though; it could. But again, we don't really know. 
Boy, was he a problem.Dekker_Tifosi said:
So do you guys still think Thomas, Kennaugh, Heano, Nieve or Roche are higher Sky ranking regarding GT? What do you think, DBotero?DBotero said:
Of course they are - at least Thomas, Henao and Nieve are way more important. Yesterday confirmed exactly way - Froome has never been isolated or in trouble like that under their watch. Konig is a more talented GC rider, but a significantly worse domestique.Kokoso said:
Kokoso said:No one knows what happened there exactly. Easy to judge now a make "clever" notes.Jagartrott said:
I really feel for the guy. It has to be terrible blow for him. He could have been on the podium with his time trial, who know on what step. He appeared in best shape ever and his shape was improving with race. If his TT improved according so, he could have been even second, or who knows, even first.
Good thing is he managed to show his potential until now.
Now I don't know if you read the question or what question you've answered, because clearly you haven't answered my question. Haven't you post to the wrong thread?DFA123 said:
Firstly pull down 2:38 or 1:44 in 37 kms time trial isn't impossible. Secondly you never know what will happen - see yesterday, right? If one told that you what carnage is gonna happen the day before, you would probably call him biased, too. One falls easily, or can have mechanical (not that I would wish so for Quintana or Froome). Yes, until now Quintana and Froome were better, I'm but König was getting better, on Pena Cabarga only six seconds behind (while he did some work for Froome) and he was arguably on par on Aubisque. You don't know how much better he could eventually get. I'm glad that you see future with such certainity and know what will or won't happen - I don't have such superhuman ability. I only was talking about possibility. You say there is no such possibility? Than you are the one who is unreasonable.HelloDolly said:Kokoso said:No one knows what happened there exactly. Easy to judge now a make "clever" notes.Jagartrott said:
I really feel for the guy. It has to be terrible blow for him. He could have been on the podium with his time trial, who know on what step. He appeared in best shape ever and his shape was improving with race. If his TT improved according so, he could have been even second, or who knows, even first.
Good thing is he managed to show his potential until now.
While I feel fro KOnig and his lost GC placing there is no way he would have been 1st or 2nd....Quintana & Froome are a level above..He is not even the leader in his team
This is why your posts attract such comments ...Your level of bias is unreasonable
Fair point, I may have answered a different question. Konig is a very good GC rider, but he's clearly not right for Sky (which is no bad thing imo - better to be an individual than a bot). Thomas, Henao and even Landa seem happy to sacrifice or limit their personal ambitions - I guess money talks in that respect.Kokoso said:
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram