Beech Mtn said:Levi Never Doped. Oh Really?
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/05/hometown_hero_levi_leipheimer.php
Thanks to Colm.Murphy for posting the link to this article in the Landis letter links thread. Thought I'd copy the link over here since it belongs here too. Wonder if the story will make it on Wikipedia now?
you are surprised? OR gullible, have not you learned a thing?TeamSkyFans said:not yet i dont think. They want either first hand documentation or quality second hand documentation.
Ive emailed the link to the article above to david walsh c/o the sunday times.. might be worth a few more people doing the same. hes the kinda guy who might well take a closer look at this one.
Im surprised cyclingnews arent willing to pick up on this one yet
TeamSkyFans said:no reply yet of course.
blackcat said:you are surprised? OR gullible, have not you learned a thing?
It's funny how wikipedia gets flack for anyone being able to put anything they want in any article, and for having rules that prevent that from happening.blackcat said:funny how wikipedia is devolving into multiple 1984 microcosms, by invoking rules
Ninety5rpm said:It's funny how wikipedia gets flack for anyone being able to put anything they want in any article, and for having rules that prevent that from happening.
Overall, I think it does an incredibly good job balancing between those two criticisms, especially on well-known/controversial topics.
There is an overriding concern at Wikipedia to not be a primary source for anything itself, especially where biographies of living persons are concerned. That's why controversial information about a living person needs to be sourced better than in a web archived article from a defunct periodical.
Everything is supposed to be properly sourced, but of course that's not actually the case, but it's especially difficult to get poorly sourced information into a BLP, and that's what this is, for now.TeamSkyFans said:but once they are dead they can put what they want
Damnit.. the day lance dies his wiki page is gonna get trashed
Ninety5rpm said:Everything is supposed to be properly sourced, but of course that's not actually the case, but it's especially difficult to get poorly sourced information into a BLP, and that's what this is, for now.
A hardcopy of that magazine has to exist somewhere. Listing the name, volume, page number etc. of it should suffice.TeamSkyFans said:and will be as long as US cycling play hard ball with the information i guess..
euanli said:Does the US not have anything like the UK's Freedom of Information Act? That would do the job in getting info about the ban.
Ninety5rpm said:A hardcopy of that magazine has to exist somewhere. Listing the name, volume, page number etc. of it should suffice.
Ninety5rpm said:A hardcopy of that magazine has to exist somewhere. Listing the name, volume, page number etc. of it should suffice.
Ninety5rpm said:Everything is supposed to be properly sourced, but of course that's not actually the case, but it's especially difficult to get poorly sourced information into a BLP, and that's what this is, for now.
Dr. Maserati said:True - but as I pointed out earlier just check the 'sources' for Lance's V02 max on his page. IIRC Both are 'runners' magazines quoting 1)an unsourced number 2) a Chris Comical 'quote'.
