Anybody have any early opinions about the licensing commission's statement that we will probably start hearing which teams will be in for 2010? At the most 7 spots for eight applying teams. What are your takes?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
taiwan said:Sorry, found the article.
I would guess that Milram and AG2R and Skil have had the poorest results of those teams. Having looked at http://www.cyclingwebsite.net (really useful), maybe AG2R have had the worst, also Kenny van Hummel is leading the Pro Continental points rankings. I'll guess that Skil get promoted over AG2R, and Milram will hang on.
Anyone think it likely that more teams will be refused, if they aren't obliged to retain 20 licenses?
Tugboat said:Cervelo opted to stay Pro Continental. They've had a successful season and have raced all the races that they wanted to. Why pay more to get deeper into the political ****fighting of the UCI? I'll bet that they'll get the invites that they want next year as well.
danyela said:Cervelo rode successfully in all the big races this season without a Pro Tour license and far as I can figure out it'll work for them again next year. This is really what teams like Ag2r and Cofidis should be looking at - if you can still to all the big races and with a much smaller budget, why are they all so desperate to be part of the Pro Tour?
danyela said:Cervelo rode successfully in all the big races this season without a Pro Tour license and far as I can figure out it'll work for them again next year. This is really what teams like Ag2r and Cofidis should be looking at - if you can still to all the big races and with a much smaller budget, why are they all so desperate to be part of the Pro Tour?