The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
BillytheKid said:So not being factual is irrelevant. What makes you think that Nissan is not ready to offer MBL a buy out? My point is that none of us here have been at the table here and is highly unlikely that Nissan would have gone forward with the deal if they had not felt they where on solid ground legally. There are several reasons that MBL would play the role of a victim, namely they would have the need to protect their brand. If only publicly so. "Posturing" is the correct term I believe.
We'll see what pans out. I wager nothing will come of it.
BillytheKid said:So not being factual is irrelevant. What makes you think that Nissan is not ready to offer MBL a buy out? My point is that none of us here have been at the table here and is highly unlikely that Nissan would have gone forward with the deal if they had not felt they where on solid ground legally. There are several reasons that MBL would play the role of a victim, namely they would have the need to protect their brand. If only publicly so. "Posturing" is the correct term I believe.
We'll see what pans out. I wager nothing will come of it.
just some guy said:William what is your wager. That they did not suggest in their press release that they may take the matter further? If so read the press release again and explain to me how I'm wrong.
If they take Becca to court remains to be seen and not what I wrote
thehog said:Problem being that along without ourselves that neither Mercedes nor Becca have been at the table! So Mercedes are much in the dark as we are! Nissan are not doing a deal with Mercedes but Becca so they don’t care about previous arrangements.
But I'm with you... I mean seriously, Mercedes local small fry Luxembourg franchise should have know better. What were they thinking sponsoring a Luxembourg based cycling team with two of cycling brightest stars form the same country? Did they seriously think they the deal would last as long as the contract stated? I mean surely they knew that "in business" you can get pushed aside, have your contract torn up without warning or consultation to be taken over by the North American arm of a Japanese Company? If they weren’t aware then they don’t deserve to be in business. Period. Move along.
BillytheKid said:Becca is a Luxembourg real-estate magnate. I find it hard to believe if he where at the table, he could burn MBL with a complete surprise and still do business in that small nation.
Well the rest of us are arguing with facts -facts like Mercedes (Lux) have a valid contract with Leopard.BillytheKid said:Thanks. If your in business for yourself, you know these things happen. I'm facing possibly being pushed out all the time because I am the small fry. Is it upsetting?Yes. Is there anything I can do about it? No, except posture and hope my credibility does not get damaged. I was trying suggest that MBL may be doing the same. If they don't, there local brand is damaged (they have abandoned the Schlecks!) If they are not perceived as being angry or at least "surprised," then they run that risk.
Yes, they have a contract, but may want out. A lease is contract, but if circumstances dictate you have to move, then you may have to break your contract or negotiate your way out of it in the best way possible.
Is any of this fact? No. I am arguing an alternative point of view.
This ESPN article does put Becca at the table:
http://espn.go.com/olympics/cycling/story/_/id/6962005/radioshack-leopard-trek-deal-intriguing-start
Becca is a Luxembourg real-estate magnate. I find it hard to believe if he where at the table, he could burn MBL with a complete surprise and still do business in that small nation.
BillytheKid said:Thanks. If your in business for yourself, you know these things happen. I'm facing possibly being pushed out all the time because I am the small fry. Is it upsetting?Yes. Is there anything I can do about it? No, except posture and hope my credibility does not get damaged. I was trying suggest that MBL may be doing the same. If they don't, there local brand is damaged (they have abandoned the Schlecks!) If they are not perceived as being angry or at least "surprised," then they run that risk.
Yes, they have a contract, but may want out. A lease is contract, but if circumstances dictate you have to move, then you may have to break your contract or negotiate your way out of it in the best way possible.
Is any of this fact? No. I am arguing an alternative point of view.
This ESPN article does put Becca at the table:
http://espn.go.com/olympics/cycling/story/_/id/6962005/radioshack-leopard-trek-deal-intriguing-start
Becca is a Luxembourg real-estate magnate. I find it hard to believe if he where at the table, he could burn MBL with a complete surprise and still do business in that small nation.
Dr. Maserati said:Well the rest of us are arguing with facts -facts like Mercedes (Lux) have a valid contract with Leopard.
The highlighted begs the question - why do you feel the need to argue an alternative viewpoint?
Dr. Maserati said:Well the rest of us are arguing with facts -facts like Mercedes (Lux) have a valid contract with Leopard.
The highlighted begs the question - why do you feel the need to argue an alternative viewpoint?
Aleajactaest said:Even if they had a contract it's not necessarily certain that this violates that contract. Most contracts have out clauses and depending on the wording, the different constitution of the team may have given LT an option to void the contract. MB Luxembourg may be surprised but we have no idea if they have any legal basis for action.
thehog said:All contracts I've dealt with have "out" clauses. It’s fairly standard as often events arise out of ordinary. But every contract I've ever worked on or written has a consultation period and forced negotiation to settle the “out”. No contract would ever state "right to terminate without cause or consultation". Not possible and I don’t think it would even be legal to have such – especially in a highly regulated country like Luxembourg. Most if not al contracts would have a notice period also that is to be sent in writing.
I think Becca has acted foolishly by signing up Nissan because he still hasn't dealt with the Mercedes issue. When they state they're considering their position what they mean is their lawyers are looking over the contracts for financial recourse. It’s coming. It also wouldn’t surprise me if Mercedes have contacted the UCI to understand how the ProTour licences are issued as this will also have bearing on the outcome.
Aleajactaest said:Even if they had a contract it's not necessarily certain that this violates that contract. Most contracts have out clauses and depending on the wording, the different constitution of the team may have given LT an option to void the contract. MB Luxembourg may be surprised but we have no idea if they have any legal basis for action.
thehog said:Cheers. Nice one. I mean its just like when Cofidis tossed aside Lance when he got sick. He understood it was "just business" and didn't make a big deal of it.
WinterRider said:You know Nissan's sponsorship probably doesn't start until January. Likely there are still nearly 4 months to provide notice (if such is required). Since no one here has read the contract, I don't see why everyone is jumping to the conclusion that Becca is in breach.
Yes, MBL is obviously upset, but that does not mean the contract is, or is going to be, breached.
Damiano Machiavelli said:Mercedes should sponsor Riis' team for next season.
"Don't get mad. Get even."
thehog said:Got it. So when my employer boots me from my job I can read about it in a press statement of the new guy being hired? Nice. I like that form of notification. Keeps things simple. Why conduct business transactions "in camera" let’s just do it through the press. Cleaner that way. Never heard so much twaddle in all my life! I cannot believe that some of you are justifying this mode of business and writing it off as “we don’t know the exact nature of the contract”. You wouldn’t accept it in your personal circumstances so I can’t see how you accept it at a sponsorship level.
I do agree that we should see how this place itself out.... I do remember Roche being forced to wear the Peugeot name on his cycling knicks when he signed for Carrera under a similar set of circumstances.
Christian said:Lol we just had a whole discussion about that a few pages back. Seriously. Read the the thread man, it's the least you can do ... it's only 134 pages.
Beech Mtn said:The Inner Ring blog reports that this isn't the first time Becca has been involved in merging sports teams.
Benotti69 said:Cofidis didn't toss aside Armstrong, but it sounds like a good story and is all part of the myth of the miracle coming back from cancer, rejected by his team and having to build a new team bla blah blah...
thehog said:I know that! I was making light of the situation! to show the "irony" in some of the responses.
Off-topic I know but Cofids paid out Armstrong 600k and released him to negotiate with other parties. Sounds to me Becca didn't provide the same courtesy to Mercedes.