the asian said:Who is leading Lampre? Pettachi and Cunego??
What about Bennati? I could see Cancellara setting a storming pace up the Poggio to shell out most of the sprinters and set it up for him.Morbius said:I expect Cav to do well in MSR, which of course doesn't mean that he will win, just that he will go better than many people think.
There are two reasons why I think he has been training specifically for this race:
1) Winning MSR in the stripes is a career goal for Cav, not just a season goal. This race has been a target for him since September.
2) His other big target for this year is the Olympics, and both MSR and the Olympics will need Cav to be better on hills than he has been in his career so far. He has already said he will sacrifice a bit of his top speed this year to work on climbing and stamina to do well in the Olympics
The interesting question is who will set the pace on the Poggio, knowing that they are setting up others for the win. Nibali seems a possibility, in order to set up Sagan. I can't see someone like Cancellara setting the pace on the Poggio as he would just drag others to the finish.
Vino attacks everyone said:deppends on how it is raced really... Cav COULD theoretically win up Zoncolan to you know![]()
Vino attacks everyone said:Don't know why, but have a feeling it will be a close 1 between EBH, Pettachi, Goss and Freire..
Dekker_Tifosi said:Indeed, FW is a bad example, one big uphill sprint.
I used to like AGR a lot when they started attacking on the Eyserbosweg and it didn't stop until the finish, but even there they wait till the Keutenberg and Cauberg now. And LBL the same, they used to attack on La Redoute, now they wait until Roche Aux Faucons or even Saint Nicolas...![]()
Flanders is probably bigger in terms of the fan base. In my view it is great as it combines cobbles, short climbs and then the run-in to the finish.Ryo Hazuki said:it's bigger than flanders for sure. simply look at the level of riders competing and the history of the race. I don't think you can find any one day race that has a better riderfield than msr other than maybe lbl and world championships and olympics. in flanders maybe 1 or 2 riders out of top 30 rankings take part.
movingtarget said:Probably because the final climb is not hard enough to shed all of the sprinters who can also climb. GVA attacked last year but Goss still hung on. Freire regularly does it. I can't see Nibali getting away from Cancellara in this type of race. I think the length of the race also works in favour of the sprinters if they can conserve their energy for as long as possible.
42x16ss said:What about Bennati? I could see Cancellara setting a storming pace up the Poggio to shell out most of the sprinters and set it up for him.
Dekker_Tifosi said:As much as I like the new and improved Nibali... on this course I'd rate even the chances of Guardini surviving the poggio higher than Nibali winning the race. Sorry nibbs
Dekker_Tifosi said:Indeed, FW is a bad example, one big uphill sprint.
I used to like AGR a lot when they started attacking on the Eyserbosweg and it didn't stop until the finish, but even there they wait till the Keutenberg and Cauberg now. And LBL the same, they used to attack on La Redoute, now they wait until Roche Aux Faucons or even Saint Nicolas...
Now the most exciting races the last few years in terms of classics were Flanders and Roubaix. But I wonder if the new finale of Flanders doesn't bore the race out (eg, favorites start waiting longer just like in agr / lbl)
Zam_Olyas said:
scullster46 said:But the idea isn't to just shed all the sprinters off the back, the poggio is too easy for that. Instead, attacking and going hard up the poggio sends the sprinters towards the back of the group and gets you a good position for the descent, which is really the key to MSR. As others have said, if you put the finish on Via Roma, the race becomes even more unpredictable and gives the punchy climbers an actual chance.
MSR is really great because it is an enigma, yes their are people who have won multiple times, but the last few years a assortment of different riders have won it. Their is no real road map as to how to win or when to attack, its hard to choose which riders to get into a break with, so on and so forth. Most races you can have some idea of who might win based on form, but with MSR its really just an educated guess. That's one of the reasons its a monument. As a cycling fan I've found that each year I get more and more excited about MSR
El Pistolero said:That's because they moved La Redoute further away from the finish
Roche aux Faucons took its place and has only been added to the race since 2008. Since that year, all winning moves have been made on the Roche aux Faucons or the section of false flat that comes after it![]()
Yup, he's good at it, it's well known from the Tour.Andy99 said:Tomorrows winnerdoing a spot of motor-pacing today..
![]()