Netserk said:Sorry, but you have to cross the finish line to win the race. What's next? Give Chicken the 2007 Tour? Merckx the 1969 Giro?
Microchip said:If he wasn't forced out of the race with a made-up transgression, he would most definitely have won.
Microchip said:If he wasn't forced out of the race with a made-up transgression, he would most definitely have won.
Microchip said:If he wasn't forced out of the race with a made-up transgression, he would most definitely have won.
Like the two other examples I mentioned, no?Microchip said:If he wasn't forced out of the race with a made-up transgression, he would most definitely have won.
Race Radio said:https://translate.google.com/transl...tolo-a-marco-pantani_2075667.shtml&edit-text=
Mercatone Uno wants 1999 Giro d'Italia awarded to Pantani
Dazed and Confused said:These clowns keeps the circus going.
Netserk said:How good do you think the others you mention would've been if they also hadn't doped? I also don't get how you can be so certain that Marco wouldn't have been a star climber in a clean environment. How should the career of a highly natural talented climber who doped with EPO in the 90's look like to you?
without being doped to the gills he would have been nowhere near as good a climber as Van Impe, Fuente, Bahamontes, or my favorite Lucho.
hrotha said:Let's not forget the 1998 Giro, the last ITT with every Mercatone rider flying and Riccardo Forconi going over the 50% limit - at least they said it was Forconi.
Whatever the circumstances surrounding the 1999 bust, the offense was real.
Netserk said:How good do you think those guy's would've been if they were born the same year as Pantani? If they had chosen to use EPO would you also call them nowhere near as good as themselves?
Benotti69 said:And Gotti is prepared to give it to him.
This sport what a joke! How can anyone even consider that there is a tiny bit of fair play involved in cycling if this kind of thing is being considered!!!
Give a doper the win because he died and maybe the mafia were involved. Why not strike the F**king race from the history books, not give it to a doper who died!!!!
doperhopper said:Here we go, "Give The Jerseys Back" strikes again (majority of Tour winners approve). And don't worry, death is not a prerequisite, Uniballer's lawyers are certainly on alert. UCI should consider to "clean the table" and give all the jerseys back, starting from "strychnine era" around the turn of the century (20th to be precise).
Nobody is saying that Pantani wasn't doping, just that there were massive irregularities leading up to his test and strong evidence of manipulation by organised crime and discriminatory action by the Italian ADA, giving good reason to believe that Pantani may not have been over the 50% limit and therefore unfairly suspended.Benotti69 said:You mean Pantani wasn't doping?, very unlikely. As i said if anything wipe it from history, but to award the win to a guy who didn't finish is not on, whether he was off the race due to made up transgressions or not! Give Landis his TdF win back then.
42x16ss said:Nobody is saying that Pantani wasn't doping, just that there were massive irregularities leading up to his test and strong evidence of manipulation by organised crime and discriminatory action by the Italian ADA, giving good reason to believe that Pantani may not have been over the 50% limit and therefore unfairly suspended.
If this is true (and it looks like it is) then surely it warrants investigation - what is to stop similar events occurring again????
I do agree that Pantani shouldn't get the '99 Giro though. Mercatone are being ridiculous...
42x16ss said:Nobody is saying that Pantani wasn't doping, just that there were massive irregularities leading up to his test and strong evidence of manipulation by organised crime and discriminatory action by the Italian ADA, giving good reason to believe that Pantani may not have been over the 50% limit and therefore unfairly suspended.
If this is true (and it looks like it is) then surely it warrants investigation - what is to stop similar events occurring again????
I do agree that Pantani shouldn't get the '99 Giro though. Mercatone are being ridiculous...
Amazinmets73 said:I always thought the situation was extremely suspicious. Pantani had the race in the bag, he did not need to take EPO (note Lance stopped using EPO during the last week of the '99 tour once he had gained a large lead.) There were millions of dollars and essentially Pantani's career at stake, I don't see how a professional doping doctor could make such a huge error. The fact that no one else on Mercatone tested positive, when they all were surely doping adds credibility to Pantani's blood sample being tampered with.
Was anyone else suspended for exceeding a 50% HTC during the '99 Giro?
Amazinmets73 said:I always thought the situation was extremely suspicious. Pantani had the race in the bag, he did not need to take EPO (note Lance stopped using EPO during the last week of the '99 tour once he had gained a large lead.) There were millions of dollars and essentially Pantani's career at stake, I don't see how a professional doping doctor could make such a huge error. The fact that no one else on Mercatone tested positive, when they all were surely doping adds credibility to Pantani's blood sample being tampered with.
Was anyone else suspended for exceeding a 50% HTC during the '99 Giro?
