Wouldn't that just be better? I mean, I'm conflicted over it regardless, because it's like, the guy with the record is somebody who has only ever won one type of stage (Aubenas '09 notwithstanding) rather than somebody who could win in every type of stage at all times, but at the same time being able to hold the record while only being able to contest 1/3 of the stages entered is arguably more impressive as an achievement, even if the vast majority of the stages won are transient, forgettable affairs, only remembered as part of the statistics they account for, i.e. the number of wins. If he breaks the record in a nondescript, nothing transitional stage, it's remarkable but it's not really a 'moment' per se. However, if he breaks the record on the Champs Elysées, as a final conclusion to the Tour in front of the Paris crowd and in the informal 'Sprinters' World Championships', that's going to be infinitely more memorable and iconic, and probably the greatest Champs moment since Vino, and will instantly become one of the most legendary Champs Elysées stages of all time, along with Hinault and Zoetemelk in '79, Lemond and Fignon in '89, Abdou's crash and Vino's solo.