Kennf1 said:No, McQuaid can't have it both ways. He can't say that a steady decrease in hemoglobin over a three week race is evidence there is less doping, and then say an increase or steady state of hemoglobin over a three week race is evidence of nothing.
We all know he won't actually comment on the question. The point is, he's just not very good at this whole spin thing.
I don't recall him saying an increase or steady-state of hemoglobin is evidence of nothing. Actually, I do recall in an interview him stating is possibly indicates the use of transfusion. But that is a possible indication and nothing the UCI should comment on specific to a rider as again I will state that is not their charter to speculate. And FYI McQuaid does not review the passport - he runs the organization. He is not spinning, he is doing the legally correct thing not to expose a rider without failed drug test - that is how it works. Got it? Probably not...