Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

[Don't be late Pedro]

Now you have gone too far. You have insulted the very lifeblood of Australia: Foster's (It's Australian for beer). Racist. Ban him.

That's what I thought but not so. No one drinks Foster's or XXXX over here. The average bogan seems to like their VB. Carlton and Blonde being pretty popular. The strange thing is that people don't really drink pints here.

 

[Ferminal]

Yes, weird bunch over there.

 

[BroDeal]

That's what I thought but not so. No one drinks Foster's or XXXX over here. The average bogan seems to like their VB. Carlton and Blonde being pretty popular. The strange thing is that people don't really drink pints here.

Don't lie. If American TV has taught me anything--and I think it has--Foster's is the favorite beer of the true aussie.

This sounds suspiciously similar to Bud Light being ranked the 12th worst beer in the world on ratebeer.com yet it somehow manages to be the best selling beer in America.

 

[Zam_Olyas]

Why is this worst than what Gallic Ho posted?

Spain is the worst. It's not even comparable with countries such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Germany.

Southern Europe is a bunch of cheaters.

Not for nothing but the new ban rule sucks.

 

[ebandit]

zam bam

Why is this worst than what Gallic Ho posted?

Not for nothing but the new ban rule sucks.

and your happy to write sarcastically......................................

"England because they have good morals, it is not in their nature to dope"

we both know that british athletes have doped as others have

yes! it is wrong to generalise and walkman is wrong to have stated what

he did even if it supported by a little evidence ( alberto / fuentes )

but NO way was the comeents by walkman as bad as those from gallicH

Mark L

 

[Zam_Olyas]

and your happy to write sarcastically......................................

"England because they have good morals, it is not in their nature to dope"

we both know that british athletes have doped as others have

yes! it is wrong to generalise and walkman is wrong to have stated what

he did even if it supported by a little evidence ( alberto / fuentes )

but NO way was the comeents by walkman as bad as those from gallicH

Mark L

It was what people were saying after last years tdf, maybe you were not a member here then.

 

[Eshnar]

Not for nothing but the new ban rule sucks.

Zam, before posting other BS please read my posts. There is no new ban rule. The next time you mention it I'll take it as trolling.

However, the post of Galic Ho was way worse that that...

 

[Zam_Olyas]

Zam, before posting other BS please read my posts. There is no new ban rule. The next time you mention it I'll take it as trolling.

However, the post of Galic Ho was way worse that that...

So, you are happy when someone call you a cheater?

 

[ebandit]

okey dokey

It was what people were saying after last years tdf, maybe you were not a member here then.

zam i don't doubt that it has been said............please read my post i am
stating that it is wrong to generalise in such a way

Mark L

 

[Eshnar]

So, you are happy when someone call you a cheater?

I'm not. The guy got a warning, in fact.

 

[sittingbison]

Walkman's comment is not acceptable, and he deserves to be warned, and the comment edited. It was not as bad as the galic ho diatribe.

If any of you have issues with any post, report it. It will certainly get looked at then rather than missed, even if the mod disagrees with you.

 

[rata de sentina]

Don't lie. If American TV has taught me anything--and I think it has--Foster's is the favorite beer of the true aussie.

This sounds suspiciously similar to Bud Light being ranked the 12th worst beer in the world on ratebeer.com yet it somehow manages to be the best selling beer in America.

Personally, I think you are taking advantage of the fact that it would be unAustralian to dob on you for your national hate speech. Also we relish a good stoush so lay on I say.

So I will meet your attack head on instead of slinking behind your back. I hesitate to divulge national secrets but the Fosters swill is strictly for export to the kind of country which is best suited to such pap. I don't think it even makes the top 10 list which does contain mostly manufactured dross but none that sink quite as low as Fosters. Anyway, I beleive that bud light is actually classified as carbonated water.

 

[hiero2]

Personally, I think you are taking advantage of the fact that it would be unAustralian to dob on you for your national hate speech. Also we relish a good stoush so lay on I say.

So I will meet your attack head on instead of slinking behind your back. I hesitate to divulge national secrets but the Fosters swill is strictly for export to the kind of country which is best suited to such pap. I don't think it even makes the top 10 list which does contain mostly manufactured dross but none that sink quite as low as Fosters. Anyway, I beleive that bud light is actually classified as carbonated water.

Well done, well done, I think! Bud and bud light are truly carbonated water with a little alcohol and flavoring added! I used to brew my own - when there were no micro brewers. Today we have some really marvelous stuff available - although American brewers are a little overly fond of hops, imo. I like a balance. I got a 2nd place at the state fair one year. About the best you can do, until you start roasting your own grains.

I do have to say - Foster's has better flavor than Bud or Bud Lite, imo. But hey, who counts me? And what are we doing discussing beer on the appreciation/depreciation thread?

 

[hiero2]

That's what I thought but not so. No one drinks Foster's or XXXX over here. The average bogan seems to like their VB. Carlton and Blonde being pretty popular. The strange thing is that people don't really drink pints here.

They don't drink pints? What the heck DO they drink? Are they on the 12 oz US commercial standard? Metric, maybe? How could you do that? Liters - yeah, that sounds good. Liters of beer!

 

[Don't be late Pedro]

They don't drink pints? What the heck DO they drink? Are they on the 12 oz US commercial standard? Metric, maybe? How could you do that? Liters - yeah, that sounds good. Liters of beer!

They have a rather complicated system that depends on which state you are in:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_in_Australia#Sizes

 

[ElChingon]

They don't drink pints? What the heck DO they drink? Are they on the 12 oz US commercial standard? Metric, maybe? How could you do that? Liters - yeah, that sounds good. Liters of beer!

They have a rather complicated system that depends on which state you are in:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_in_Australia#Sizes

Just in case a real mod hasn't intervened but there is a real beer thread, if you're so interested on the subject you're probably best to post there for a beer reply before someone start to talk about other things and some real mod gets all huffy about going off topic.

 

[Ferminal]

They have a rather complicated system that depends on which state you are in:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_in_Australia#Sizes

Lookout for the scammers who try and pass off a pint as 0.5l

 

[sublimit]

That would put me into a huff if that happened. Thats worse than being called a cheat.

 

[airstream]

Nope. He got banned for the accumulation of trolling, and ignoring several warnings from the mod team.

it's absolute BS

I intentically didn't visit the thread because I hoped you wouldn't stop cheating people, nonetheless you continue...

if one gets warning for the post 'Froome was significantly stornger than Contador at Prati Tivo' what happened to me, such an administrator is a forum shame. No user should be a victim of evil administrator lawlessness. Using your dirty methods, many many users can be banned, HOWEVER you fanatically defend Contador and Nibali and ban the guy who remind you about the things you don't want to deal with. That is obvious double standarts. You better than me know that if one goes by your policy. you yourself Netserk
would have been banned many times.

Caruut, Christian and other guys would agree to me, 1000000%

I still your and ferrymans replies. I answered many question.

 

[Netserk]

You certainly don't seem to have learned anything from your ban judging by your posts since that.

Next time you accuse me of stuff, please link to it. Then I might take you seriously.

 

[airstream]

You certainly don't seem to have learned anything from your ban judging by your posts since that.

Next time you accuse me of stuff, please link to it. Then I might take you seriously.

you didn't asnwer my questions. And I guess it doesn't happen because you don't know what to answer to look authoritatively and plausibly.

Do you have semehing to object on why the forum member gets warning for the post

If a working decision had been that simple, Contador would have guessed.

I'm asking not to consider my words a ridicule — I'm being serious — but Froome could win today's stage going solo in a more spectacular fashion too, but the plan was to use team tactical building maximally because this option was more realiable.

?
is that normal???

Yes, I'm indignant to put it mildly. and I deserve to get a proper explanation. I don't need a coward accumulation umbrella for 10th time. When you banned me you knew my character and realized that I wouldn't treat it like a gutless creature. So it gets even stranger why you can't answer anything.

 

[Netserk]

Why are you bashing me with a 'warning' (it wasn't a warning) you got from another mod?

 

[airstream]

ok, no problem here. i'll expect until ferryman replies

 

[Netserk]

Just to make it clear for others what 'warning' airstream refers to:

If a working decision had been that simple, Contador would have guessed.

I'm asking not to consider my words a ridicule — I'm being serious — but Froome could win today's stage going solo in a more spectacular fashion too, but the plan was to use team tactical building maximally because this option was more realiable.

No, I don't think you are being serious, I think you are surfing the edge of trolling and baiting.

 

[MarkvW]

Zam, before posting other BS please read my posts. There is no new ban rule. The next time you mention it I'll take it as trolling.

However, the post of Galic Ho was way worse that that...

Zam: This must NOT be Eshnar posting "as a moderator" this MUST be Eshnar just posting "as a forum member." Because Eshnar is just posting "as a forum" member, I'm sure that Eshnar does not expect you to heed his statement.

Because, as Sitting Bison says, warnings are only issued by moderators via messaging. And, it is dishonest, as Sitting Bison says, to suggest otherwise.

Crazy moderation.