Men Elite Road Race - UCI RWC Doha 2016

Page 27 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

infeXio said:
I don't even know why you dignify it with a response anymore..
Because sometimes even when it's not directed with the deliberate intention of needling me as it was from many corners for a period, and sometimes even when I'm outright avoiding him, the Sagan sycophancy gets too much for me to bear and keep my cool about.
 
Aug 6, 2015
4,139
2
0
Re: Re:

Libertine Seguros said:
Miburo said:
Come on, no is doing it anymore? Jesus, guess it's up to me

LS WHERE ARE YOU???? WHY DO YOU HATE SAGAN?

:p
Really?

I've literally watched two races he's been involved in this year. Literally. It's apparently never boring to add more sycophancy to the Sagan bandwagon, but it's apparently boring to hear any opinion that isn't gushing in praise, and because I find him so objectionable I can't help myself getting wound up by it, and because I get wound up by it so easily people keep poking the bear, to prevent all of the Sagan Defandboys from throwing a strop at me every time I say anything remotely negative about Slovak Barbosa, I've just taken to avoiding him all out.

Sometimes you just get a sense something is going to happen. At the Ronde I was so angry about Lizzie beating Emma J at the end that I just knew it meant Sagan would win, and I would lose my rag and probably get myself banned. So I didn't watch the Ronde van Vlaanderen. I got that same feeling today. This World Championships has been such a shower of garbage from start to finish that as soon as the riders who made the selection were announced on social media, I just had that sense he was going to win, so I didn't watch, so as not to repeat the Richmond go-around. I don't recant anything I said then, nor do I have any intention of apologizing to any of the people I insulted simply by proxy of liking or defending Sagan. But while "Sagan is amazing", "Sagan is a beast" and "Sagan is the best thing to happen since the invention of the bicycle and a model human being omgyea!" can apparently never be heard enough, I've been told often enough that voicing my contrary opinion is boring, so to stop myself from throwing those same tantrums as I did last year I've been steering clear of him as much as possible. Doha got the World Championships based on vulgar, opulent excess, so he's the perfect winner for them, when you think about it.
Wtf? So much hate!!!
 
Re: Re:

portugal11 said:
Libertine Seguros said:
Miburo said:
Come on, no is doing it anymore? Jesus, guess it's up to me

LS WHERE ARE YOU???? WHY DO YOU HATE SAGAN?

:p
Really?

I've literally watched two races he's been involved in this year. Literally. It's apparently never boring to add more sycophancy to the Sagan bandwagon, but it's apparently boring to hear any opinion that isn't gushing in praise, and because I find him so objectionable I can't help myself getting wound up by it, and because I get wound up by it so easily people keep poking the bear, to prevent all of the Sagan Defandboys from throwing a strop at me every time I say anything remotely negative about Slovak Barbosa, I've just taken to avoiding him all out.

Sometimes you just get a sense something is going to happen. At the Ronde I was so angry about Lizzie beating Emma J at the end that I just knew it meant Sagan would win, and I would lose my rag and probably get myself banned. So I didn't watch the Ronde van Vlaanderen. I got that same feeling today. This World Championships has been such a shower of garbage from start to finish that as soon as the riders who made the selection were announced on social media, I just had that sense he was going to win, so I didn't watch, so as not to repeat the Richmond go-around. I don't recant anything I said then, nor do I have any intention of apologizing to any of the people I insulted simply by proxy of liking or defending Sagan. But while "Sagan is amazing", "Sagan is a beast" and "Sagan is the best thing to happen since the invention of the bicycle and a model human being omgyea!" can apparently never be heard enough, I've been told often enough that voicing my contrary opinion is boring, so to stop myself from throwing those same tantrums as I did last year I've been steering clear of him as much as possible. Doha got the World Championships based on vulgar, opulent excess, so he's the perfect winner for them, when you think about it.
Wtf? So much hate!!!
Can we just not do this again.
 
Re: Re:

Libertine Seguros said:
Miburo said:
Come on, no is doing it anymore? Jesus, guess it's up to me

LS WHERE ARE YOU???? WHY DO YOU HATE SAGAN?

:p
Really?

I've literally watched two races he's been involved in this year. Literally. It's apparently never boring to add more sycophancy to the Sagan bandwagon, but it's apparently boring to hear any opinion that isn't gushing in praise, and because I find him so objectionable I can't help myself getting wound up by it, and because I get wound up by it so easily people keep poking the bear, to prevent all of the Sagan Defandboys from throwing a strop at me every time I say anything remotely negative about Slovak Barbosa, I've just taken to avoiding him all out.

Sometimes you just get a sense something is going to happen. At the Ronde I was so angry about Lizzie beating Emma J at the end that I just knew it meant Sagan would win, and I would lose my rag and probably get myself banned. So I didn't watch the Ronde van Vlaanderen. I got that same feeling today. This World Championships has been such a shower of garbage from start to finish that as soon as the riders who made the selection were announced on social media, I just had that sense he was going to win, so I didn't watch, so as not to repeat the Richmond go-around. I don't recant anything I said then, nor do I have any intention of apologizing to any of the people I insulted simply by proxy of liking or defending Sagan. But while "Sagan is amazing", "Sagan is a beast" and "Sagan is the best thing to happen since the invention of the bicycle and a model human being omgyea!" can apparently never be heard enough, I've been told often enough that voicing my contrary opinion is boring, so to stop myself from throwing those same tantrums as I did last year I've been steering clear of him as much as possible. Doha got the World Championships based on vulgar, opulent excess, so he's the perfect winner for them, when you think about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktsCrJMRp3w

You don't like him, that's cool. If anyone gives you heat just ignore them. BTW, Your Dope Tour team was great.
 
Sep 6, 2016
584
0
0
Re: Re:

Libertine Seguros said:
Miburo said:
Come on, no is doing it anymore? Jesus, guess it's up to me

LS WHERE ARE YOU???? WHY DO YOU HATE SAGAN?

:p
Really?

I've literally watched two races he's been involved in this year. Literally. It's apparently never boring to add more sycophancy to the Sagan bandwagon, but it's apparently boring to hear any opinion that isn't gushing in praise, and because I find him so objectionable I can't help myself getting wound up by it, and because I get wound up by it so easily people keep poking the bear, to prevent all of the Sagan Defandboys from throwing a strop at me every time I say anything remotely negative about Slovak Barbosa, I've just taken to avoiding him all out.

Sometimes you just get a sense something is going to happen. At the Ronde I was so angry about Lizzie beating Emma J at the end that I just knew it meant Sagan would win, and I would lose my rag and probably get myself banned. So I didn't watch the Ronde van Vlaanderen. I got that same feeling today. This World Championships has been such a shower of garbage from start to finish that as soon as the riders who made the selection were announced on social media, I just had that sense he was going to win, so I didn't watch, so as not to repeat the Richmond go-around. I don't recant anything I said then, nor do I have any intention of apologizing to any of the people I insulted simply by proxy of liking or defending Sagan. But while "Sagan is amazing", "Sagan is a beast" and "Sagan is the best thing to happen since the invention of the bicycle and a model human being omgyea!" can apparently never be heard enough, I've been told often enough that voicing my contrary opinion is boring, so to stop myself from throwing those same tantrums as I did last year I've been steering clear of him as much as possible. Doha got the World Championships based on vulgar, opulent excess, so he's the perfect winner for them, when you think about it.

Two things:

1) Sagan did something inappropriate. He did that once. I don't think he'd be married if he viewed women as objects for his personal enjoyment like you seem to enjoy. You do not get to anoint yourself as moral arbitrator.

2) That's all well and good, but don't kill the fun of others doing it. It's fine if you don't want to watch a race where Sagan is a contender, that's your loss not ours. But please, please, don't come trotting in acting like a race was garbage and that you knew the race would be won three hours before it ended because of some odd circumstances. Personal anecdotes are not science, riders don't win just because people have a certain feeling about a certain situation.

I very much enjoy your comments, and your wealth of knowledge is rivaled by few on this forum, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way.
 
Re: Re:

Libertine Seguros said:
infeXio said:
I don't even know why you dignify it with a response anymore..
Because sometimes even when it's not directed with the deliberate intention of needling me as it was from many corners for a period, and sometimes even when I'm outright avoiding him, the Sagan sycophancy gets too much for me to bear and keep my cool about.

I don't blame you for being wound up. Though I don't agree with your dislike for Sagan, I can only applaud you for sticking so firmly to your principles and actually taking your time to respond. :)
 
Would Sagan fanboys still dare to lament that everybody is sucking his wheel after this.

I mean did he ever put his nose in the front before the final 200m. I'm quite serene because this win is worthless anyway. I've always said this, even long before Sagan turned pro. Nothing to feel bitter for Libs or for me. Cycling fans need to realise that this performance is way overrated.
 
Re: Re:

Red Rick said:
Flamin said:
Red Rick said:
Belgian riders and commentators and experts all very proud of riding to their own execution together

******. Planckaert just said they made a tactical mistake in the final 5k. Bit butthurt that the Belgians singlehandedly prevented a Dutch WC I guess.
You know what they did well?
Split the peloton in the desert

You know what they did wrong
They rode for a sprint of a guy who hasn't won a bunch sprint in ages, against a guy's that are just faster no matter how the race went. They couldn't seriously have thought Boonen would beat Sagan? Beat Cavendish after he only sat on wheels for 250km? Sure.

They had 6 guys in the group of 26 riders, and they still only rode for a medal.

Ofcourse I'm butthurt.

That does not mean I'm wrong.

Cmon, Keukeleire, Naesen and Stuyven don't count. They had pulled for 3 hours straight and were not going to do anything. Greg was the designated guy to attack, but everybody knew it. Same with Terpstra. Both didn't get an inch of space. Good luck dropping other very strong riders on a flat road then when they're glued to your wheel. Besides, Greg wasn't super either.

Then yes, what's left is a sprint for Boonen. Could you share with us a tactic that could have made them win the race?

Btw, haven't seen one critical note about the Italians, yet they also had 3 'fresh' guys for the final.
 
Jul 15, 2014
161
0
0
June 2015:
"And when the Daily Express put it to Cavendish that the Slovakian could be considered his sprinting equal because of his three Green Jerseys, he appeared almost insulted by the suggestion.

"I've always beaten him convincingly. Always," said Cavendish, speaking at an event in London to promote American Pistachios. "He's not a sprinter. He wins the Green Jersey because no one else goes for the intermediate points."



Another amazing result for humanity. What a man Peter Sagan is.
 
Sep 6, 2016
584
0
0
Re: Re:

Jancouver said:
Billie said:
When was the last time that all 3 riders on the podium had already been World Champ?

Probably never?

1981 counts if you include riders who would go on to win the world title. Maertens, Saronni (1982 champion) and Hinault. Same with 85 and Moreno Argentin.
 
Re: Re:

Flamin said:
Red Rick said:
Flamin said:
Red Rick said:
Belgian riders and commentators and experts all very proud of riding to their own execution together

******. Planckaert just said they made a tactical mistake in the final 5k. Bit butthurt that the Belgians singlehandedly prevented a Dutch WC I guess.
You know what they did well?
Split the peloton in the desert

You know what they did wrong
They rode for a sprint of a guy who hasn't won a bunch sprint in ages, against a guy's that are just faster no matter how the race went. They couldn't seriously have thought Boonen would beat Sagan? Beat Cavendish after he only sat on wheels for 250km? Sure.

They had 6 guys in the group of 26 riders, and they still only rode for a medal.

Ofcourse I'm butthurt.

That does not mean I'm wrong.

Cmon, Keukeleire, Naesen and Stuyven don't count. They had pulled for 3 hours straight and were not going to do anything. Greg was the designated guy to attack, but everybody knew it. Same with Terpstra. Both didn't get an inch of space. Good luck dropping other very strong riders on a flat road then. Besides, Greg wasn't super either.

Then yes, what's left is a sprint for Boonen. Could you share with us a tactic that could have made them win the race?

Btw, haven't seen one critical note about the Italians, yet they also had 3 'fresh' guys for the final.

All 3 italians are renowned sprinters
 
Re: Re:

GuyIncognito said:
Flamin said:
Red Rick said:
Flamin said:
Red Rick said:
Belgian riders and commentators and experts all very proud of riding to their own execution together

******. Planckaert just said they made a tactical mistake in the final 5k. Bit butthurt that the Belgians singlehandedly prevented a Dutch WC I guess.
You know what they did well?
Split the peloton in the desert

You know what they did wrong
They rode for a sprint of a guy who hasn't won a bunch sprint in ages, against a guy's that are just faster no matter how the race went. They couldn't seriously have thought Boonen would beat Sagan? Beat Cavendish after he only sat on wheels for 250km? Sure.

They had 6 guys in the group of 26 riders, and they still only rode for a medal.

Ofcourse I'm butthurt.

That does not mean I'm wrong.

Cmon, Keukeleire, Naesen and Stuyven don't count. They had pulled for 3 hours straight and were not going to do anything. Greg was the designated guy to attack, but everybody knew it. Same with Terpstra. Both didn't get an inch of space. Good luck dropping other very strong riders on a flat road then. Besides, Greg wasn't super either.

Then yes, what's left is a sprint for Boonen. Could you share with us a tactic that could have made them win the race?

Btw, haven't seen one critical note about the Italians, yet they also had 3 'fresh' guys for the final.

All 3 italians are renowned sprinters

Yeah, but way worse than Boonen.

I don't criticize neither, but if you criticize the Belgians, you might as well do the same with Italy.
 
Mar 15, 2016
520
0
0
Echoes said:
Would Sagan fanboys still dare to lament that everybody is sucking his wheel after this.

I mean did he ever put his nose in the front before the final 200m. I'm quite serene because this win is worthless anyway. I've always said this, even long before Sagan turned pro. Nothing to feel bitter for Libs or for me. Cycling fans need to realise that this performance is way overrated.

So people like Cav's entire career is worthless then?