RobbieCanuck said:
I have been able to find one interview with Clara after Barry fessed up, here is what she said verbatim,
That sport is so corrupt that it actually corrupted someone who I think had the most beautiful spirit the sport ever saw. It just says the sport is in a place, I don't know maybe even beyond repair.
I have misplaced the link but she was interviewed by CBC in Winnipeg.
Barrys statement at the time included the following,
I crossed a line I promised myself and others I would not: I doped. It was a decision I deeply regret. It caused me sleepless nights, took the fun out of cycling and racing, and tainted the success I achieved at the time. This was not how I wanted to live or race.
After the summer of 2006, I never doped again and became a proponent of clean cycling through my writing and interviews.
From 2006 until the end of my career in 2012, I chose to race for teams that took a strong stance against doping. Although I never confessed to my past, I wrote and spoke about the need for change. Cycling is now a cleaner sport, many teams have adopted anti-doping policies and most importantly I know a clean rider can now win at the highest level.
I
apologize to those I deceived
When you put these statements together it makes it clear CH was deceived by Barry.
Another link I found where Hughes said essentially the same thing as she did in Winnipeg is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oW2sn8i8zE
Next time do your own research, if you really wanted to know her reaction!
Thanks, but this is all pretty indirect and incredibly vague. Sounds more like someone perpetuating a lie.
Setting aside the banal nature of this 'apology', to apply Barry's statement(s) to Clara is over-specifying. Grossly so.
You are forgetting:
1. That he wrote an "Inside" book which proclaimed there was no doping.
- He certainly owes an apology to every single person that read that book
2. Partly because of his writing and self-promoted "Inside" perspective, many, many people approached Michael (and his father for that matter) to have Michael be honest about what he might know about Lance's doping as the whole affair was unfolding. He denied and lied and lied.
- He owes an apology to each and every one of those people
3. His dad is 'in the industry', was his father aware?
- If not, he owes his father a much bigger apology than he might owe Clara
4. If his father was aware, is it possible that Michael is trying to shield him from public scrutiny?
- That would make sense, in a way
5. He was in a position to win the Worlds in Hammertown.
- Doesn't he owe his fans that were there and Canadian sportswriters an apology?
-> the above points are just for starters on who and what that throwaway phrase you quoted could apply to.
Now, when it comes to Clara, she is simply passing the buck.
Oh,
that sport is so dirty.
THAT sport!
Isn't there something a little Clintonesque about that?
Wait a second. Didn't she participate in THAT sport? How did her relationship with the sport get so Monica-like?
AND let's not forget Dede here.
How did Michael and Dede relate to other 'friends' about doping?
Oh, shucks, they aided and abetted. They helped them see the light that 'it isn't doping if everyone else is doing it'. How convenient.
Ok, let's give Clara the benefit of the doubt. Maybe Clara just wasn't the friend she thought and claimed she was.
Or, maybe by saying that cycling is so corrupt, Clara is also taking what could be a spoon fed Michael and Dede line. Is she excusing Michael, who is clearly guilty of a long and open public fraud, or is she self-rationalizing, or both?
Clara is an icon, and I am not looking to bring her down.
But you cannot be serious when you offer these 'statements' as proof that we have had an honest conversation about this from either Clara or Michael.
You might want to check your cycling glasses. They appear to be taking on a slight rosy shade when it comes to Michael and Clara.
When you get the non-specific 'everyone I deceived' statements, and the distancing 'that sport' comments, shouldn't your BS meter be going off?
Dave.