Re: Re:
Just because someone is not a pure climber like Froome (as in can TT well, and does well in flat stages) it doesn't mean he can't be a better climber than those who can do nothing else well but climb
Taxus4a said:Vino attacks everyone said:Miburo said:I wonder how landa would have done? I think he definitely could have stayed with quintana.
If our numbers on Froome are correct (6.09 or whatever) then Froome wasn't as extrodinary as we thnik. AC, Nibali has both produced those numbers in the past, Landa in this years giro wouldn't have been far off.
I know well as cycliist from several years to Landa, and I repeat again, Landa is similar rider than Quintana, but a point below.
But this kind of comparations are difficul, yesterday was the forst mounatins stage and just one climb, with tail wind,good conditions to performe..hot, but froome and quintana are very good with hot, as Nibali is with rain...
Froome is not a pure climber, so the best performances in the climbs wont be made for him, but for people as Quintana, Purito, Landa, etc...but for a stage like yesterday is not a question of climbers, is the stronger of the race who is going to climb better, becouse everybody has in the lesgs the previous week and the rest flat of the stage.
Just because someone is not a pure climber like Froome (as in can TT well, and does well in flat stages) it doesn't mean he can't be a better climber than those who can do nothing else well but climb