Moderators

[gregod]

Off the top of my head and after only one cup of coffee so far this morning, I would say no, also no links. That is still associating the forum with the questionable material, and there would be a good chance that some other user might post, "Wow! Did you see xxxxxx?????!!!???"

If you absolutely must share such links, then via PM or email.

Susan

even indirectly making fun of faerie tales is not permitted. <stunned silence>

 

[Susan Westemeyer]

even indirectly making fun of faerie tales is not permitted. <stunned silence>

I have no idea what you mean.

Susan

 

[Cobblestoned]

Wonder why exactly the boomcie was banned ?
Need some clarification. Confusion still around.

There still seems to be no straight line regarding the finger-issue. Right, Susan ?
You still remember or no idea what I mean ?

 

[MacRoadie]

Wonder why exactly the boomcie was banned ?
Need some clarification. Confusion still around.

There still seems to be no straight line regarding the finger-issue. Right, Susan ?
You still remember or no idea what I mean ?

Tick-tock, tick-tock...

 

[Cobblestoned]

Tick-tock, tick-tock...

No no, MacRusty, tick-tack just ended when you pushed the "Submit Reply" button. I call it the "MacRusty-countdown".

One could get the impression that commenting my posts in a nonesayin manner is one of your greatest passions around here.
Whats your intention ? Just tell me.
You feel better after that ?
UBS ?
That fact that I just respond to 1 out of 10 of your attempts makes you crazy, hmmm ?
Well....appreciated.

Now get the hell back into your dog hut, while we are trying to solve a significant issue that is essential for survival of mankind, and you see.....that issue is so complicated that all that comes out of your mouth is just "tick-tock".

 

[palmerq]

No no, MacRusty, tick-tack just ended when you pushed the "Submit Reply" button. I call it the "MacRusty-countdown".

One could get the impression that commenting my posts in a nonesayin manner is one of your greatest passions around here.
Whats your intention ? Just tell me.
You feel better after that ?
UBS ?
That fact that I just respond to 1 out of 10 of your attempts makes you crazy, hmmm ?
Well....appreciated.

Now get the hell back into your dog hut, while we are trying to solve a significant issue that is essential for survival of mankind, and you see.....that issue is so complicated that all that comes out of your mouth is just "tick-tock".

ease off mr cobblestoned, that's a bit harsh, are you trying to get in trouble again?

 

[Hugh Januss]

ease off mr cobblestoned, that's a bit harsh, are you trying to get in trouble again?

If he doesn't get banned from time to time, he can't complain about being unfairly singled out.

 

[Martin318is]

Wonder why exactly the boomcie was banned ?
Need some clarification. Confusion still around.

There still seems to be no straight line regarding the finger-issue.

No, there is no confusion whatsoever. The reason Boomcie was suspended was clearly advised to him. It was because of continued baiting and harrassment of the moderators following his initial infraction, ignoring repeated warnings. End of.

 

[MacRoadie]

No no, MacRusty, tick-tack just ended when you pushed the "Submit Reply" button. I call it the "MacRusty-countdown".

One could get the impression that commenting my posts in a nonesayin manner is one of your greatest passions around here.
Whats your intention ? Just tell me.
You feel better after that ?
UBS ?
That fact that I just respond to 1 out of 10 of your attempts makes you crazy, hmmm ?
Well....appreciated.

Now get the hell back into your dog hut, while we are trying to solve a significant issue that is essential for survival of mankind, and you see.....that issue is so complicated that all that comes out of your mouth is just "tick-tock".

Getting a bit worked up, are we?

I call that "Watching another Online Einstein self-destruct on the forum by relentlessly insulting anyone and everyone, including the mods and admins, after repeated warnings and suspensions.", but that's a bit long-winded so I'll just refer to it as "Cobble-boned"

 

[Martin318is]

okay that will do.

That type of discussion is likely to get both of you in trouble, so lets end it there.

 

[Cobblestoned]

ease off mr cobblestoned, that's a bit harsh, are you trying to get in trouble again?

Unecessary, if you mods would care about MacRusty and his strange behavior.
Look, he baits 3-4 times in his typical style.
I don't react and give a s***. When it got on and on, he was slowly nerving me. Took the decision to report and complain instead of taking care of him myself. Even when I hate it.
Nothing happened.
So yesterday, after next few times, I took care of the guy myself.
What would you do ?

No, I won't put him on ignore. No one is on my list. Problem should be solved by the mods, when you don't allow me to respond accuratly.
Easy thing.

 

[Cobblestoned]

No, there is no confusion whatsoever. The reason Boomcie was suspended was clearly advised to him. It was because of continued baiting and harrassment of the moderators following his initial infraction, ignoring repeated warnings. End of.

Hey, Martin.
Cool down. It's just fun and offseason, you know.

I find the unsolved finger-issue really funny.

As I understood it, Boomcie was banned for heavily complaining about a finger-avatar/pic.
Perhaps you remember that we (at least Susan and me) were discussing the unsolved finger-issue even a month before it came up again.

I got a warning for trying to solve the finger-issue, and an infraction for posting Mr.Gallagher giving different types of fingers, so that we would know which, and how many fingers are allowed, or not.

Boomcie was banned for heavily complaining about a finger-avatar/pic, and decision was made, that avatars/pic that were giving a finger were still allowed.

What now ?
Total confusion.

I am just trying to understand.

 

[Cobblestoned]

If he doesn't get banned from time to time, he can't complain about being unfairly singled out.

Well, that was better than tick-tock.
No more need for me to point out the obvious.

I just find the finger-issue pretty interesting and I am looking for a straight line.
But to be honest, I don't really care and was just bored.

 

[ramjambunath]

Is obscenity worse than a post about war mongering and a clear threat?

 

[ramjambunath]

Can't we post in spoilers?

PS Cobblestoned, the finger itself is pretty straight.

 

[Timmy-loves-Rabo]

wait, dt finger pic?

@ramjambunath

I have suggested spoiler tages a couple times, find it odd that such basic elements aren't in use here.

Spoiler

fail

 

[Zam_Olyas]

We have decided to ban Luke Schmid for one month. There is no excuse for posting a threat of physical violence against any forum-member.


who did he threatened? where?

 

[Susan Westemeyer]

You ought to know we are not going to repeat deleted offensive material.

Susan

ETA: Nor does it matter who he threatened, or where it appeared. As Francois indicated, threats of physical violence are absolutely not acceptable.

 

[Zam_Olyas]

You ought to know we are not going to repeat deleted offensive material.

Susan

ETA: Nor does it matter who he threatened, or where it appeared. As Francois indicated, threats of physical violence are absolutely not acceptable.

I knew this was coming ..i was just testing the bounds of reality.

 

[craig1985]

I was more wondering what threat he had his melt down in.

 

[usedtobefast]

like he could find me!

 

[Francois the Postman]

That's enough on Luke guys. It seems to have been out of character, but it is a serious offence. Let's just leave it at that.

This thread is about our shortcomings, flaws and meltdowns. Which leaves plenty to rake over....

 

[Zam_Olyas]

Can you move this thread out of the Clinic and put in Cafe http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=11559

 

[Anonymous]

I was more wondering what threat he had his melt down in.

I think it was the father christmas thread where he completely missed the joke and thought Martin318 was accusing him of hating children.

I dont think I have seen anyone ever get the wrong end of the stick so badly. Shame he has decided to leave though. Hopefully he will have second thoughts.

 

[Martin318is]

I think it was the father christmas thread where he completely missed the joke and thought Barrus was accusing him of hating children.

I dont think I have seen anyone ever get the wrong end of the stick so badly. Shame he has decided to leave though. Hopefully he will have second thoughts.

oh come on! am I that insignificant that people confuse me with other members?