saganftw said:
3,2,1 until RS haters pop up...jk
i havent seen milram doin anything this tour,ciolek is pproly overhyped as a sprinter
but i think you are bit unfair to rabo...2 top 10 is great succes
The word "disappointing" implies that one had expectations of success. Milram had none of those. Ciolek isn't an elite sprinter and Gerdemann is as overrated as they come. He's not a grand tour contender and he can barely compete in the weeklong stage races unless the elite are there primarily for training. He's a classic "tweener". Decent at a couple of things but not exceptional at anything.
The Shack has to be the monumental disappointment of the Tour. Arriving with the strongest grand tour team and to have only one rider finish in the top ten of the gc when so much more was expected regardless of Armstrong's intimacy with the pavement. Leipheimer and Kloden produced zilch.
Leipheimer couldn't even come top 20 in the ITT, an event that many thought that he tanked the Tourmalet stage for because they thought that he felt he had a chance of winning the ITT.
Armstrong at no time exhibited the ability to climb with the top tier gc contenders even before his crashes. Him then commencing to soft-pedal for all but the one stage that he got in a break, especially after saying that he would be riding for Leipheimer was a slap in the face to his teammates, not that I believed for a second that he really would do as he said.
Paulinho's stage win has to be the highlight, regardless of their winning the team classification. With the lineup they had (Armstrong, Leipheimer, Kloden) and the parameters of the team classification competition, if they didn't win that would have been even more of a failure.
Team Sky would be my runner up because of their complete inability to adapt on the fly to Wiggins' failure. They had no plan b and seemed at a loss of what to do with Wiggins continually off the back on every mountain.