The whole motor doping area is littered with people talking nonsense that some of the valid points and links I think are being missed.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I wouldn't be surprised if Lance never used a motor during his yellow jersey days, but in fact Voeckler did so in 2011 & 2012!MartinGT said:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/mechanical-doping-voeckler-wouldnt-be-shocked-if-lance-armstrong-had-used-a-motor/
Its all Lances fault.
staubsauger said:I wouldn't be surprised if Lance never used a motor during his yellow jersey days, but in fact Voeckler did so in 2011 & 2012!MartinGT said:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/mechanical-doping-voeckler-wouldnt-be-shocked-if-lance-armstrong-had-used-a-motor/
Its all Lances fault.
glassmoon said:V - still same attention wh0re.
Get the LA and motodoping into one sentence and media are all over you. He just loves it.
ClassicomanoLuigi said:I was thinking it would have to be some kind of advanced battery, since it cannot be that the motor itself is supposed to be the size of a USB drive. But that's how the description reads, the whole motor. And in that case, we would probably have to think along the lines of combustion or radioactivity... or ... ???ScienceIsCool said:I could see him buying the rights from Varjas for $2 million even if he never used it. Just to keep it away from his competitors. It just makes sense. If Varjas started shopping it around, an actually bright engineer would learn of the idea and run with it.
John Swanson
A bomb...If a USB flash drive has a volume about 5 cubic centimeters, and the USB-sized Varjas device can generate 140 watts for 5 minutes, that's a power density of 28 W/cm3, and energy density of 2.33 Wh/cm3
What type of device might that be, within those constraints of volume and energy?
The best Li Ion cells are capable of 0.6 Wh/ml.
fournir 140 watts = to provide the power. So it means the generated power, not the consumptionUnless of course you're talking about a motor which consumes that much energy.
It was just a rhetorical question or small thought-experiment on the improbability of the Varjas device as described. If it is real, then for sure it would be worth a lot more than $2 million to all kinds of industrialists, miiltary, etc. Then the whole espionage and death-threat scenarios from the book make sense as wellAnyways, I super doubt you could get 140 Watts output from that small of a motor unless it was stupid high rpm and that didn't include the casing. Even then, cooling would be a problem
John Swanson
Oh, look, Lance was hiding the Varjas motor in plain sight !
That's brilliant - let's not let it fall into the wrong hands
Watts are Watts - measure of work in Joules/second. For rotations, it can be expressed as torque x w, where w is radians per second and the "x" is a cross product since w is a vector. The only problem is that the motors you describe run at a Brazillion rpm and no torque. To get anything useful, you have to translate that work into a reasonable torque and rpm. That means gearing and lots of. Which will have enormous friction losses and be huge.samhocking said:The issue isn't the watts. 150W electric motors the size of your thumb can be found for less than $10. The issue is always going to be that power in order to use it in a bike depends on its Torque multiplied by Speed and the direction of travel works against you.
With regards to the fight against technological fraud, the UCI Management Committee has approved the proposals explored over the past few weeks that aim to strengthen the effectiveness of race checks. A detailed plan of action will be unveiled at a press conference on 21st March.
The decision to integrate e-mountain bike into the UCI has also been approved by the Management Committee, in response to growing public interest in this new form of cycling. Discussions will be held over the coming year with National Federations and representatives of the cycling industry, with a view to creating an initial set of regulations for this discipline from 2019. However, it is already the intention that electric starting systems will only be triggered once leg movement has begun, and will cut out when leg movement stops. This electric assistance must also cease when the bike reaches 25 km/h, and the engine must not exceed 250 watts.
ClassicomanoLuigi said:The wheels are Mavic, but the fork and the frame don't look like standard Cannondale42x16ss said:https://www.facebook.com/likecyclingtoday/videos/1199850683483292/
It’s grainy footage but looks like a bog standard Super Six with Mavic wheels...
But, the point, of course, is that it might as well be one of many well-known standard carbon frames
It proves the frame doesn't need to have a wide seat tube to conceal a motor. I am wondering if both the motor and the batteries are in the down tube, or if batteries in the seat tube
This is kind of sad. There was an interview with Wiggins in which he said he believes bikes with motors have been used at the pro level, about five years ago, but he thinks it's not a problem anymore. And that he understands the motive is similar to chemical doping, of one's own body, but still, 'motor-doping' is kind of absurd, because it defeats the purpose of cycling. Voeckler said something similar.
In the Bassons video, it says he chased after a mid-level amateur in his car, and they found the motor when they confiscated the guy's bike. At the amateur level, what is the motive for this? Because there is no money or fame or anything to be gained
pastronef said:http://www.twitter.com/MRasmussen1974
I am sure @lancearmstrong was on lost of things in 1999 but a motor was not one of them. High octane fuel yes - fantastic biologic engine yes -mechanical doping no Way. Just my five cents
Freddythefrog said:pastronef said:http://www.twitter.com/MRasmussen1974
I am sure @lancearmstrong was on lost of things in 1999 but a motor was not one of them. High octane fuel yes - fantastic biologic engine yes -mechanical doping no Way. Just my five cents
Great, that is that one laid to rest then. Them pesky conspiracy theorists; they need to be told.
Tell me again how the omerta works ?
But faced with say Pantaniebandit said:...imagine? if lance not only required a boat load of PEDS but a motor too ............and still appeared totally
knackered at the top of climbs then he must have managed to have been an even poorer cyclist than myself....................................
Mark L
dolophonic said:Today Paris Nice day 1 - in the crash a few kms from the finish a bunch of riders went down.
The Katusha riders bike back wheel was really spinning .. took out another rider and kept on spinning ..looked very unusual ..