thehog said:
red_flanders said:
ScienceIsCool said:
Cycle Chic said:
Would it be possible to have a motor which could be put on and off the bike by the rider ? this would explain how motors are being used but not detected.
The motor could be hidden in the hub, but all the other electronic bits (wiring, battery, electronics, motor driver) would have to be in the frame. But the main reason motors haven't been found is that a la Cancellara they were too new to be tested for. And the iPads were a joke, not actual testing or anyone with e-shifting would have been positive. And staying one step ahead would mean reluctance motors with no magnets.
And now with x-rays, you just have to make sure that the bike that gets checked isn't the one with the motor.
John Swanson
When you say "just" are you suggesting it's easy to swap out? Just curious either way, and if it would be easy, how? I can't figure it out.
I think you can figure it out. You just need to not finish on said bike or have a wheel change. Considering the x-ray ice cream van is so slow at checking and is being used sparingly. BAU it appears.
I get the first bit, but it doesn't help on a mountain top finish. And the report I heard about the machine strongly asserted that the first 5 or so, can't recall exactly, were scanned as soon as they crossed the finish line. Doping control and scan, immediately. So that's where I tend to wonder how you'd get around that.
And mountain top finishes are where you would need the motor the most, presumably.