Valv.Piti said:
I don't think its a problem, but its something he has to consider for a while and I think he will after realising how he won the Vuelta. The whole approach going into the Tour - how to beat Froome? We know Sky will be much, much better in the Tour and this won't happen, but I think it might have opened his eyes to gain time unexpectedly and whenever you can.
The bottom line is: he beat Froome in a GT. Confidence wise, it's huge. At the TdF, he always looked spooked, tentative, if you take away the late Tour surges, when he was so far behind in the GC that Froome was keeping it vanilla and managing his lead.
For his mental, it's huge. True, he could have been more aggressive and dropped Froome in the final 4K. He didn't have to. He was easy, and his sprinting came across as a statement: "yep Dawg, I'm still fresh".
This could be a defining moment in his quest to slay the TdF-Froome-Dragon. Because that is the goal, or should be the goal. To cement your legacy, you have to beat the champ. I.e. McEnroe Wimbledon '81...or even Thevenet '75 for that matter. Gardner winning the gold versus a legend.
His greatest achievement thus far. Cheers Nairo Quintana.
Note: he can produce decent ITT,
the key for me really comes down to matching Sky as a team.